ArticleBMJ open2012
Time trends in STEMI--improved treatment and outcome but still a gender gap: a prospective observational cohort study from the SWEDEHEART register.
Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex Differences and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Trial
- Sex Differences in Clinical Profile, Revascularization and In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Critique on "Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction".Clinical cardiology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Sex-Based Differences in the Prescription of the Combination of Evidence-Based Medicine After the Occurrence of an Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Clinical cardiology · 2025Article
- Observational
- Quality of care for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention in 2009-2017: population-wide cohort study of antiplatelet therapy use in Scotland.BMJ quality & safety · 2024Article
- In-hospital mortality of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after implementation of national health insurance (NHI) in Indonesia.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence based prediction model of in-hospital mortality among females with acute coronary syndrome: for the Jerusalem Platelets Thrombosis and Intervention in Cardiology (JUPITER-12) Study Group.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- Pharmaco-invasive Strategy in Myocardial Infarction: Descriptive Analysis, Presentation of Ischemic Symptoms and Mortality Predictors.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Sex-related differences in the management and outcomes of patients hospitalized with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison within four European myocardial infarction registries.European heart journal open · 2022Article
- Five years of a comprehensive ST-elevation myocardial infarction protocol and its association with sex disparities.European heart journal open · 2021Article
- Impact of regionalizing ST-elevation myocardial infarction care on sex differences in reperfusion times and clinical outcomes.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
- Evaluation of sex differences in patients with ST-elevated myocardial infarction: an observational cohort study in Amsterdam and surrounding region.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2020Article
- Gender differences in the revascularization rates and in-hospital outcomes in hospitalizations with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.Irish journal of medical science · 2020Article
- A 10- and 15-year performance analysis of ESC/EAS and ACC/AHA cardiovascular risk scores in a Southern European cohort.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Article
- "Door-In to Door-Out" Delay in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Transferred for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in a Metropolitan STEMI Network of a Developing Country.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2020Article
- Gender differences in acute coronary syndromes patterns during the COVID-19 outbreak.American journal of cardiovascular disease · 2020Article
- The Year in Cardiology 2018: ABC Cardiol and RPC at a glance.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Article
- Implementation and impact analysis of a transitional care pathway for patients presenting to the emergency department with cardiac-related complaints.BMC health services research · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn ST elevation myocardial infarction women received less evidence-based medicine and had worse outcome during the fibrinolytic era. With the shift to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) as preferred reperfusion strategy, the authors aimed to investigate whether these gender differences has diminished. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsCohort study including consecutive ST elevation myocardial infarction patients registered 1998-2000 (n=15 697) and 2004-2006 (n=14 380) in the Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions. OUTCOME MEASURES: 1. Use of evidence-based medicine such as reperfusion therapy (pPCI or fibrinolysis) and evidence-based drugs at discharge. 2. Inhospital and 1-year mortality.
resultsOf those who got reperfusion therapy, pPCI was the choice in 9% in the early period compared with 68% in the late period. In the early period, reperfusion therapy was given to 63% of women versus 71% of men, p<0.001. Corresponding figures in the late period were 64% vs 75%, p<0.001. After multivariable adjustments, the ORs (women vs men) were 0.86 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.94) in the early and 0.80 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.89) in the late period. As regards evidence-based secondary preventive drugs at discharge in hospital survivors (platelet inhibitors, statins, ACE inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and β-blockers), there were small gender differences in the early period. In the late period, women had 14%-25% less chance of receiving these drugs, OR 0.75 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.81) through 0.86 (95% CI 0.73 to 1.00). In both periods, multivariable-adjusted inhospital mortality was higher in women, OR 1.18 (95% CI 1.02 to 1.36) and 1.21 (1.00 to 1.46). One-year mortality was gender equal, HR 0.95 (95% CI 0.87 to 1.05) and 0.96 (0.86 to 1.08), after adding evidence-based medicine to the multivariable adjustments.
conclusionIn spite of an intense gender debate, focus on guideline adherence and the change in reperfusion strategy, the last decade gender differences in use of reperfusion therapy and evidence-based therapy at discharge did not decline during the study period, rather the opposite. Moreover, higher mortality in women persisted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.