ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2012
Comparing the reprogramming efficiency of mouse embryonic fibroblasts, mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone marrow mononuclear cells to iPSCs.
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Effectively Eliminates Endotoxemia to Protect Rat from Acute Liver Failure Induced by Thioacetamide.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2022Article
- Culture of iPSCs Derived PancreaticBioMed research international · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Induced pluripotent stem cells have been derived from various cell types via the ectopic expression of a cocktail of transcription factors. Previous studies have reported that induced pluripotent stem cells can be differentiated into multiple somatic cells, providing an invaluable resource in regenerative medicine. In this study, we compared the reprogramming efficiency of mouse embryonic fibroblasts, mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, and mouse bone marrow mononuclear cells by counting the number of alkaline phosphatase staining positive clones on day 15 after induced pluripotent stem cells induction. We found that a very low number of alkaline phosphatase-staining positive clones were derived from mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. We then evaluated the pluripotency of the clones by detecting the expression of embryonic stem cells markers and assessing their ability to form embryoid bodies and teratomas. Mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells population is more homogeneous than mouse bone marrow mononuclear cells, which includes a variety of cell types. Our study indicated that the extremely low efficiency of mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induction implies that mouse bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells may not be a suitable cell type for the induction of induced pluripotent stem cells unless the efficiency of induction can be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22457082What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.