Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22456984›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2012

Mechanisms of estrogen-independent breast cancer growth driven by low estrogen concentrations are unique versus complete estrogen deprivation.

Matthew J Sikora, Viktoriya Strumba, Marc E Lippman, Michael D Johnson, James M Rae

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew J SikoraDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Viktoriya Strumba
Marc E Lippman
Michael D Johnson
James M Rae
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USGeorgetown University · USMichigan Center for Translational Pathology · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUUL1TR000101 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MELLMAN, THOMAS A, VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2012 to 2015
$19.3M
INTERDEPARTMENTAL TRAINING IN PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCEST32GM007767 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ISOM, LORI L. · 1985 to 2019
$10.2M
Genetic Predictors of Anti-Estrogen Clinical Activity in Breast Cancer PatientsR01GM099143 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI RAE, JAMES MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000101NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM099143NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099143NIGMS NIH HHS T-32 GM007767NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007767
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the success of the aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in treating estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, 15-20 % of patients receiving adjuvant AIs will relapse within 5-10 years of treatment initiation. Long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) of breast cancer cells in culture mimics AI-induced estrogen depletion to dissect mechanisms of AI resistance. However, we hypothesized that a subset of patients receiving AI therapy may maintain low circulating concentrations of estrogens that influence the development of endocrine resistance. We expanded established LTED models to account for incomplete suppression of estrogen synthesis during AI therapy. MCF-7 cells were grown in medium with charcoal-stripped serum supplemented with defined concentrations of 17β-estradiol (E2) or the estrogenic androgen metabolite 5α-androstane-3β,17β-diol (3βAdiol), an endogenous selective estrogen receptor modulator. Cells were selected in concentrations of E2 or 3βAdiol that induce 10 or 90 percent of maximal proliferation (EC(10) and EC(90), respectively), or estrogen deprived. Estrogen independence was evaluated during selection by assessing cell growth in the absence or presence of E2 or 3βAdiol. Following >7 months of selection, estrogen independence developed in estrogen-deprived cells and EC(10)-selected cells. Functional analyses demonstrated that estrogen-deprived and EC(10)-selected cells developed estrogen independence via unique mechanisms, ERα-independent and dependent, respectively. Estrogen-independent proliferation in EC(10)-selected cells could be blocked by kinase inhibitors. However, these cells were resistant to kinase inhibition in the presence of low steroid concentrations. These data demonstrate that further understanding of the total estrogen environment in patients on AI therapy who experience recurrence is necessary to effectively treat endocrine-resistant disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogensFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansMCF-7 CellsPhosphorylationProtein Kinase InhibitorsSignal TransductionEstrogensProtein Kinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22456984
PMCPMC3951731
OpenAlexW2047483325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.