Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22456885›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2012

Variation in founder groups promotes establishment success in the wild.

Anders Forsman, Lena Wennersten, Magnus Karlsson, Sofia Caesar

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Indirect Selection on Flower Color inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On the role of sex differences for evolution in heterogeneous and changing fitness landscapes: insights from pygmy grasshoppers.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  7. Balanced genetic diversity improves population fitness.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Anders ForsmanSchool of Natural Sciences, Linnaeus University, 391 82 Kalmar, Sweden. anders.forsman@lnu.se
Lena Wennersten
Magnus Karlsson
Sofia Caesar
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental changes currently pose severe threats to biodiversity, and reintroductions and translocations are increasingly used to protect declining populations and species from extinction. Theory predicts that establishment success should be higher for more variable groups of dissimilar individuals. To test this 'diversity promotes establishment' hypothesis, we introduced colour polymorphic pygmy grasshoppers (Tetrix subulata) to different sites in the wild. The number of descendants found at the release sites the subsequent year increased with increasing number of colour morphs in the founder group, and variation in founder groups also positively affected colour morph diversity in the established populations. Since colour morphs differ in morphology, physiology, behaviour, reproductive life history and types of niche used, these findings demonstrate that variation among individuals in functionally important traits promotes establishment success under natural conditions, and further indicate that founder diversity may contribute to evolutionary rescue and increased population persistence.

Indexed as

EcosystemFounder EffectAnimalsGenetic VariationGrasshoppersPigments, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsPigments, Biological

Identifiers

PMID22456885
PMCPMC3367781
OpenAlexW2153207808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.