Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22456699›Full record

Trial reportDysphagia2012

Survey of usual practice: dysphagia therapy in head and neck cancer patients.

Gintas P Krisciunas, William Sokoloff, Katherine Stepas, Susan E Langmore

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Dysphagia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03455608 (PRO-ACTIVE), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03455608 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

PRO-ACTIVE: Comparing The Effectiveness of Prophylactic Swallow Intervention for Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2018 to 2024Enrolled952ConditionsDysphagiaArmsRE-ACTIVE, PRO-ACTIVE EAT, PRO-ACTIVE EAT + EXERCISE
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A comparison of the head lift exercise and recline exercise in patients with chronic head and neck cancer post-radiation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  17. Resilience: an essential element in head and neck cancer survivorship and quality of life.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Adherence to Dysphagia Treatment Recommendations: A Conceptual Model.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  20. Evaluation of a speech pathology service delivery model for patients at low dysphagia risk during radiotherapy for HNC.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gintas P KrisciunasDepartment of Otolaryngology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA. gintas.krisciunas@bmc.org
William Sokoloff
Katherine Stepas
Susan E Langmore
Boston Medical Center · USBoston University · USUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

Efficacy of Electrical Stimulation for Dysphagia in Head & Neck Cancer PatientsR01CA120950 · NCI · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI LANGMORE, SUSAN E · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120950NCI NIH HHS R01CA120950-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no standardized dysphagia therapy for head and neck cancer patients and scant evidence to support any particular protocol, leaving institutions and individual speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to determine their own protocols based on "typical" practices or anecdotal evidence. To gain an understanding of current usual practices, a national internet-based survey was developed and disseminated to SLPs who treat head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. From a random sample of 4,000 ASHA SID13 members, 1,931 fit the inclusion criteria, and 759 complete responses were recorded for a 39.3 % response rate. Results were analyzed by institution type as well as by individual clinical experience. While some interesting trends emerged from the data, a lack of uniformity and consensus regarding best practices was apparent. This is undoubtedly due to a paucity of research adequately addressing the efficacy of any one therapy for dysphagia in the HNC population.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultDeglutition DisordersHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansIncidenceMassachusettsPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSpeech-Language Pathology

Identifiers

PMID22456699
PMCPMC3431461
OpenAlexW1990817355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.