Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22455793›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2012

Biocatalysts and small molecule products from metagenomic studies.

Hala A Iqbal, Zhiyang Feng, Sean F Brady

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The role of soils in provision of genetic, medicinal and biochemical resources.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bacterial natural product biosynthetic domain composition in soil correlates with changes in latitude on a continent-wide scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Culture-independent discovery of natural products from soil metagenomes.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hala A IqbalLaboratory of Genetically Encoded Small Molecules, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, United States.
Zhiyang Feng
Sean F Brady

Funding

Discovery and characterization of new natural products from uncultured bacteriaR01GM077516 · NIGMS · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI BRADY, SEAN F · 2006 to 2014
$3.0M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS GM077516NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast majority of bacteria present in environmental samples have never been cultured and therefore have not been exploited for the ability to produce useful biocatalysts or collections of biocatalysts generating interesting small molecules. Metagenomic libraries constructed using DNA extracted directly from natural bacterial communities offer access to the genetic information present in the genomes of these as yet uncultured bacteria. This review highlights recent efforts to recover both discrete enzymes and small molecules from metagenomic libraries.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisMetagenomicsAnimalsBiological ProductsDatabases, FactualGenomeHumansBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID22455793
PMCPMC3335775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.