Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22455759›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2012

Clinicians' adherence versus non adherence to practice guidelines in the management of patients with sarcoma: a cost-effectiveness assessment in two European regions.

Lionel Perrier, Alessandra Buja, Giuseppe Mastrangelo, Antonella Vecchiato, Paolo Sandonà, Françoise Ducimetière, Jean-Yves Blay, François Noël Gilly, Carole Siani, Pierre Biron and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Let there be Guidance!!!Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgery in reference centers improves survival of sarcoma patients: a nationwide study.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. [Systematic planning of surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Improved survival using specialized multidisciplinary board in sarcoma patients.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Interdisciplinary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Lionel PerrierUniversity of Lyon, F-69007 Lyon, France. lionel.perrier@lyon.unicancer.fr
Alessandra Buja
Giuseppe Mastrangelo
Antonella Vecchiato
Paolo Sandonà
Françoise Ducimetière
Jean-Yves Blay
François Noël Gilly
Carole Siani
Pierre Biron
Dominique Ranchère-Vince
Anne-Valérie Decouvelaere
Philippe Thiesse
Christophe Bergeron
Angelo Paolo Dei Tos
Jean-Michel Coindre
Carlo Riccardo Rossi
Isabelle Ray-Coquard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the management of sarcoma is improving, non adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) remains high, mainly because of the low incidence of the disease and the variety of histological subtypes. Since little is known about the health economics of sarcoma, we undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis (within the CONnective TIssue CAncer NETwork, CONTICANET) comparing costs and outcomes when clinicians adhered to CPGs and when they did not.

methodsPatients studied had a histological diagnosis of sarcoma, were older than 15 years, and had been treated in the Rhône-Alpes region of France (in 2005/2006) or in the Veneto region of Italy (in 2007). Data collected retrospectively for the three years after diagnosis were used to determine relapse free survival and health costs (adopting the hospital's perspective and a microcosting approach). All costs were expressed in euros (€) at their 2009 value. A 4% annual discount rate was applied to both costs and effects. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was expressed as cost per relapse-free year gained when management was compliant with CPGs compared with when it was not. To capture uncertainty surrounding ICER, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed based on a non-parametric bootstrap method.

resultsA total of 219 patients were included in the study. Compliance with CPGs was observed for 118 patients (54%). Average total costs reached 23,571 euros when treatment was in accordance with CPGs and 27,313 euros when it was not. In relation to relapse-free survival, compliance with CPGs strictly dominates non compliance, i.e. it is both less costly and more effective. Taking uncertainty into account, the probability that compliance with CPGs still strictly dominates was 75%.

conclusionsOur findings should encourage physicians to increase their compliance with CPGs and healthcare administrators to invest in the implementation of CPGs in the management of sarcoma.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherencePractice Guidelines as TopicAgedCatchment Area, HealthCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleFranceHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID22455759
PMCPMC3382421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.