Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22454499›Full record

Trial reportProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2012

Efficacy of vaccination with recombinant vaccinia and fowlpox vectors expressing NY-ESO-1 antigen in ovarian cancer and melanoma patients.

Kunle Odunsi, Junko Matsuzaki, Julia Karbach, Antje Neumann, Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia, Austin Miller, Amy Beck, Carl D Morrison, Gerd Ritter, Heidi Godoy and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Antigen-specific active immunotherapy for ovarian cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NY-ESO-1 antigen: A promising frontier in cancer immunotherapy.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Ovarian Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kunle OdunsiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA. le.odunsi@roswellpark.org
Junko Matsuzaki
Julia Karbach
Antje Neumann
Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia
Austin Miller
Amy Beck
Carl D Morrison
Gerd Ritter
Heidi Godoy
Shashikant Lele
Nefertiti duPont
Robert Edwards
Protul Shrikant
Lloyd J Old
Sacha Gnjatic
Elke Jäger
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USKrankenhaus Nordwest · DEMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USGynecologic Oncology Group · USLudwig Cancer Research · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MARK G FRATTINI · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
Postdoctoral Research Training in Surgical OncologyT32CA108456 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI YENDAMURI, SAIKRISHNA · 2006 to 2020
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS T32 CA108456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant poxviruses (vaccinia and fowlpox) expressing tumor-associated antigens are currently being evaluated in clinical trials as cancer vaccines to induce tumor-specific immune responses that will improve clinical outcome. To test whether a diversified prime and boost regimen targeting NY-ESO-1 will result in clinical benefit, we conducted two parallel phase II clinical trials of recombinant vaccinia-NY-ESO-1 (rV-NY-ESO-1), followed by booster vaccinations with recombinant fowlpox-NY-ESO-1 (rF-NY-ESO-1) in 25 melanoma and 22 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients with advanced disease who were at high risk for recurrence/progression. Integrated NY-ESO-1-specific antibody and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were induced in a high proportion of melanoma and EOC patients. In melanoma patients, objective response rate [complete and partial response (CR+PR)] was 14%, mixed response was 5%, and disease stabilization was 52%, amounting to a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 72% in melanoma patients. The median PFS in the melanoma patients was 9 mo (range, 0-84 mo) and the median OS was 48 mo (range, 3-106 mo). In EOC patients, the median PFS was 21 mo (95% CI, 16-29 mo), and median OS was 48 mo (CI, not estimable). CD8(+) T cells derived from vaccinated patients were shown to lyse NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor targets. These data provide preliminary evidence of clinically meaningful benefit for diversified prime and boost recombinant pox-viral-based vaccines in melanoma and ovarian cancer and support further evaluation of this approach in these patient populations.

Indexed as

VaccinationAntibody FormationAntigens, NeoplasmCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleFowlpox virusGenetic VectorsHumansMelanomaMembrane ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsTreatment OutcomeVaccines, SyntheticVaccinia virusAntigens, NeoplasmCTAG1B protein, humanEpitopes, T-LymphocyteMembrane ProteinsVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22454499
PMCPMC3326498
OpenAlexW1999389341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.