Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22454288›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism2012

Validity of triple- and dual-tracer techniques to estimate glucose appearance.

A Haidar, D Elleri, J M Allen, J Harris, K Kumareswaran, M Nodale, C L Acerini, M E Wilinska, N Jackson, A M Umpleby and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. A novel natural tracer method to measure complex carbohydrate metabolism.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of insulin action on carbohydrate metabolism: physiological and non-physiological methods.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2013
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

A HaidarMetabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom.
D Elleri
J M Allen
J Harris
K Kumareswaran
M Nodale
C L Acerini
M E Wilinska
N Jackson
A M Umpleby
M L Evans
D B Dunger
R Hovorka

Funding

Home testing of 24/7 closed-loop control in children and adolescents with type 1R01DK085621 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE · PI HOVORKA, ROMAN · 2009 to 2010
$748k
Medical Research Council G0600717NIDDK NIH HHS 1R01 DK-085621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The triple-tracer (TT) dilution technique has been proposed to be the gold standard method to measure postprandial glucose appearance. However, validation against an independent standard has been missing. We addressed this issue and also validated the simpler dual-tracer (DT) technique. Sixteen young subjects with type 1 diabetes (age 19.5 ± 3.8 yr, BMI 23.4 ± 1.5 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) 8.7 ± 1.7%, diabetes duration 9.0 ± 6.9 yr, total daily insulin 0.9 ± 0.2 U·kg(-1)·day(-1), mean ± SD) received a variable intravenous 20% dextrose infusion enriched with [U-(13)C]glucose over 8 h to achieve postprandial-resembling glucose excursions while intravenous insulin was administered to achieve postprandial-resembling levels of plasma insulin. Primed [6,6-(2)H(2)]glucose was infused in a manner that mimicked the expected endogenous glucose production and [U-(13)C; 1,2,3,4,5,6,6-(2)H(7)]glucose was infused in a manner that mimicked the expected glucose appearance from a standard meal. Plasma glucose enrichment was measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The intravenous dextrose infusion served as an independent standard and was reconstructed using the TT and DT techniques with the two-compartment Radziuk/Mari model and an advanced stochastic computational method. The difference between the infused and reconstructed dextrose profile was similar for the two methods (root mean square error 6.6 ± 1.9 vs. 8.0 ± 3.5 μmol·kg(-1)·min(-1), TT vs. DT, P = NS, paired t-test). The TT technique was more accurate in recovering the overall dextrose infusion (100 ± 9 and 92 ± 12%; P = 0.02). The root mean square error associated with the mean dextrose infusion profile was 2.5 and 3.3 μmol·kg(-1)·min(-1) for the TT and DT techniques, respectively. We conclude that the TT and DT techniques combined with the advanced computational method can measure accurately exogenous glucose appearance. The TT technique tends to outperform slightly the DT technique, but the latter benefits from reduced experimental and computational complexity.

Indexed as

Radioactive TracersRadioisotope Dilution TechniqueAdolescentAlgorithmsArea Under CurveBlood GlucoseCarbon RadioisotopesData Interpretation, StatisticalDeuteriumFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansInfusions, IntravenousInsulinBlood GlucoseCarbon RadioisotopesDeuteriumGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinInsulinRadioactive Tracers

Identifiers

PMID22454288
PMCPMC3378162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.