Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22454003›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of family planning and reproductive health care2012

Contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of ethinylestradiol 20 μg/drospirenone 3 mg in a flexible extended regimen: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled study.

Christine Klipping, Ingrid Duijkers, Michel P Fortier, Joachim Marr, Dietmar Trummer, Jörg Elliesen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of family planning and reproductive health care, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00266032 (A Multicenter, Open, Randomized, Parallel Group Comparison to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the Oral Contraceptive SH T00186D), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00266032 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Open, Randomized, Parallel Group Comparison to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the Oral Contraceptive SH T00186D (0.02 mg Ethinylestradiol as Betadex Clathrate and 3 mg Drospirenone) in Two Variations of an Extended Regimen vs. a Standard Regimen (24 + 4 Days) in 1122 Healthy Female Volunteers for One Year, Followed by a One Year Safety Extension

TypeinterventionalSponsorBayerRan2005 to 2008Enrolled1,166ConditionsContraceptionArmsFlexible (extended) treatment of EE20/DRSP (YAZ, BAY86-5300), Fixed extended treatment of EE20/DRSP (YAZ, BAY86-5300), Standard 24+4 treatment of EE20/DRSP (YAZ, BAY86-5300)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christine KlippingDinox BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ingrid Duijkers
Michel P Fortier
Joachim Marr
Dietmar Trummer
Jörg Elliesen
Bayer (Germany) · DECanadian Women's Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe contraceptive efficacy and tolerability of a new flexible extended regimen of ethinylestradiol (EE) 20 μg/drospirenone (DRSP) 3 mg to extend the menstrual cycle and enable management of intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding (flexible(MIB)) was investigated and the bleeding pattern compared with a conventional 28-day regimen and a fixed extended 124-day regimen. STUDY

designThis Phase III, 2-year, multicentre, open-label study randomly (4:1:1) allocated women (aged 18-35 years) to the following regimens: flexible(MIB) (24-120 days' active hormonal intake with 4-day tablet-free intervals); conventional (24 days' active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day hormone-free interval); or fixed extended (120 days' uninterrupted active hormonal intake followed by a 4-day tablet-free interval). Primary outcomes included the number of bleeding/spotting days during Year 1 (all regimens) and the number of observed unintended pregnancies over 2 years (flexible(MIB) only).

resultsResults were analysed in 1067 women (full analysis set). The mean number of bleeding/spotting days was lower with the flexible(MIB) vs the conventional regimen [41.0±29.1 (95% CI 38.8-43.3) vs 65.8±27.0 (95% CI 62.2-69.4) days, p<0.0001; treatment difference -24.8 (95% CI -29.2 to -20.3) days]. The corresponding value for the fixed extended regimen was 60.9±51.1 (95% CI 53.9-67.9) days. The Pearl Index for the flexible(MIB) regimen was 0.64 (95% CI 0.28-1.26). All regimens had comparable tolerability profiles.

conclusionsEE 20 μg/DRSP 3 mg administered as a flexible extended regimen with MIB is effective, well tolerated and is associated with statistically significantly fewer bleeding/spotting days and fewer withdrawal bleeding episodes vs EE/DRSP in a conventional 28-day regimen. The flexible(MIB) also provided statistically significantly fewer spotting days vs EE/DRSP in a fixed extended 124-day regimen (post hoc evaluation). The flexible(MIB) regimen allows women to extend their menstrual cycle and manage their intracyclic (breakthrough) bleeding.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAndrostenesContraceptives, Oral, CombinedDrug Administration ScheduleEthinyl EstradiolFemaleHumansMetrorrhagiaYoung AdultAndrostenesContraceptives, Oral, Combineddrospirenone and ethinyl estradiol combinationEthinyl Estradiol

Identifiers

PMID22454003
PMCPMC3353880
OpenAlexW2126908963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.