Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22453701›Full record

ReviewCurrent gastroenterology reports2012

Advanced endoscopic imaging for Barrett's Esophagus: current options and future directions.

Michelle H Lee, Kristin Buterbaugh, Rebecca Richards-Kortum, Sharmila Anandasabapathy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current gastroenterology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Esophageal organoids: applications and future prospects.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  2. Targeted Hsp70 fluorescence molecular endoscopy detects dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management strategies of Barrett's esophagus.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle H LeeDivision of Gastroenterology, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Kristin Buterbaugh
Rebecca Richards-Kortum
Sharmila Anandasabapathy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Barrett's esophagus is the precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, one of the most rapidly increasing cancers in the United States. Given the poor prognosis of late-stage adenocarcinoma, endoscopic surveillance is recommended for subjects with Barrett's esophagus to detect early neoplasia. Current guidelines recommend "random" four-quadrant biopsies taken every 1-2 cm throughout the Barrett's segment. However, this only samples a minority of epithelium and has been shown to miss areas of endoscopically- inapparent neoplasia (high grade dysplasia or cancer). Recent efforts have focused on developing novel diagnostic imaging technologies to detect the subtle epithelial changes associated with dysplasia and neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Some of these modalities serve as "red flag" technologies designed to detect areas of abnormality within large surface areas. Other technologies serve to characterize areas of visible abnormality, offering a higher spatial resolution to confirm/exclude the presence of neoplasia. This review summarizes several available and evolving imaging technologies used in the endoscopic diagnosis and surveillance of Barrett's associated neoplasia.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalPrecancerous ConditionsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.