Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22453091›Full record

ArticlemAbs

IBC's 22nd Annual Antibody Engineering and 9th Annual Antibody Therapeutics International Conferences and the 2011 Annual Meeting of The Antibody Society, December 5-8, 2011, San Diego, CA.

Johan Nilvebrant, D Cameron Dunlop, Aroop Sircar, Thierry Wurch, Emilia Falkowska, Janice M Reichert, Gustavo Helguera, Emily C Piccione, Simon Brack, Sven Berger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Johan NilvebrantSchool of Biotechnology; Department of Proteomics; Royal Institute of Technology (KTH); AlbaNova University Center; Stockholm, Sweden.
D Cameron DunlopThe Scripps Research Institute; La Jolla, CA USA.
Aroop SircarEMD Serono Research Institute; Billlerica, MA USA.
Thierry WurchOncology Research Division, Institut de Recherche SERVIER; Croissy sur Seine, France.
Emilia FalkowskaThe Scripps Research Institute; La Jolla, CA USA.
Janice M ReichertLandes Bioscience; Austin, TX USA.
Gustavo HelgueraFarmacotecnia I, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica; University of Buenos Aires; Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Emily C PiccioneStandford Cancer Institute; Stanford University School of Medicine; Stanford, CA USA.
Simon BrackCovagen AG; Zürich Schlieren, Switzerland.
Sven BergerInstitut de Recherche Pierre Fabre, Centre d'Immunologie Pierre Fabre; St Julien en Genevois, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 22nd Annual Antibody Engineering and 9th Annual Antibody Therapeutics international conferences, and the 2011 Annual Meeting of The Antibody Society, organized by IBC Life Sciences with contributions from The Antibody Society and two Scientific Advisory Boards, were held December 5-8, 2011 in San Diego, CA. The meeting drew ~800 participants who attended sessions on a wide variety of topics relevant to antibody research and development. As a preview to the main events, a pre-conference workshop held on December 4, 2011 focused on antibodies as probes of structure. The Antibody Engineering Conference comprised eight sessions: (1) structure and dynamics of antibodies and their membrane receptor targets; (2) model-guided generation of binding sites; (3) novel selection strategies; (4) antibodies in a complex environment: targeting intracellular and misfolded proteins; (5) rational vaccine design; (6) viral retargeting with engineered binding molecules; (7) the biology behind potential blockbuster antibodies and (8) antibodies as signaling modifiers: where did we go right, and can we learn from success? The Antibody Therapeutics session comprised five sessions: (1)Twenty-five years of therapeutic antibodies: lessons learned and future challenges; (2) preclinical and early stage development of antibody therapeutics; (3) next generation anti-angiogenics; (4) updates of clinical stage antibody therapeutics and (5) antibody drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalSocieties, MedicalAnimalsCaliforniaCongresses as TopicHumansProtein EngineeringAntibodies, Monoclonalantibody-antigen structureantibody-drug conjugatesantibody engineeringantibody therapeuticsbispecific antibodiescomputational designvaccine design

Identifiers

PMID22453091
PMCPMC3361653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.