Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22452964›Full record

ArticleTrials2012

Typical investigational medicinal products follow relatively uniform regulations in 10 European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries.

Christian Gluud, Christine Kubiak, Kate Whitfield, Jane Byrne, Karl-Heinz Huemer, Steffen Thirstrup, Christian Libersa, Béatrice Barraud, Xina Grählert, Gabriele Dreier and 18 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

Christian GluudCopenhagen Trial Unit-CTU, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, and the Danish Clinical Research Infrastructures Network-DCRIN, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. cgluud@ctu.rh.dk
Christine Kubiak
Kate Whitfield
Jane Byrne
Karl-Heinz Huemer
Steffen Thirstrup
Christian Libersa
Béatrice Barraud
Xina Grählert
Gabriele Dreier
Sebastian Geismann
Wolfgang Kuchinke
Zsuza Temesvari
Gyorgy Blasko
Gabriella Kardos
Timothy O'Brien
Margaret Cooney
Siobhan Gaynor
Arrigo Schieppati
Fernando de Andres
Nuria Sanz
German Kreis
Charlotte Asker-Hagelberg
Hanna Johansson
Sue Bourne
Adeeba Asghar
Jean-Marc Husson
Jacques Demotes-Mainard
Ministry of Health · HUCopenhagen University Hospital · DKEuropean Clinical Research Infrastructure Network · FRGIS-Institut pour la Recherche en Santé Publique · FRInserm · FRSpanish Clinical Research Network · ESUniversity Medical Center Freiburg · DEDanish Medicines Agency · DKEuropean Forum for Good Clinical Practice · BEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research · ITMedical University of Vienna · ATNIHR Clinical Research Network · GBOllscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway · IEUnited Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration · GBUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEWythenshawe Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to facilitate multinational clinical research, regulatory requirements need to become international and harmonised. The EU introduced the Directive 2001/20/EC in 2004, regulating investigational medicinal products in Europe.

methodsWe conducted a survey in order to identify the national regulatory requirements for major categories of clinical research in ten European Clinical Research Infrastructures Network (ECRIN) countries-Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and United Kingdom-covering approximately 70% of the EU population. Here we describe the results for regulatory requirements for typical investigational medicinal products, in the ten countries.

resultsOur results show that the ten countries have fairly harmonised definitions of typical investigational medicinal products. Clinical trials assessing typical investigational medicinal products require authorisation from a national competent authority in each of the countries surveyed. The opinion of the competent authorities is communicated to the trial sponsor within the same timelines, i.e., no more than 60 days, in all ten countries. The authority to which the application has to be sent to in the different countries is not fully harmonised.

conclusionThe Directive 2001/20/EC defined the term 'investigational medicinal product' and all regulatory requirements described therein are applicable to investigational medicinal products. Our survey showed, however, that those requirements had been adopted in ten European countries, not for investigational medicinal products overall, but rather a narrower category which we term 'typical' investigational medicinal products. The result is partial EU harmonisation of requirements and a relatively navigable landscape for the sponsor regarding typical investigational medicinal products.

Indexed as

Government RegulationHealth PolicyBiomedical ResearchConsumer Product SafetyDevice ApprovalDrug ApprovalDrugs, InvestigationalEuropeGuideline AdherenceGuidelines as TopicHumansInternational CooperationSurveys and QuestionnairesDrugs, Investigational

Identifiers

PMID22452964
PMCPMC3338370
OpenAlexW2171152710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.