Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22452475›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of bioethics : AJOB2012

Swabbing students: should universities be allowed to facilitate educational DNA testing?

Shawneequa L Callier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Genomically Informed Education System? Challenges for Behavioral Genetics.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Progress and potential: training in genomic pathology.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Personalized genomic educational testing: what do the undergrads think?The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2012
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shawneequa L CallierGeorge Washington University, Clinical Research and Leadership, 900 23rd Street NW, School of Medicine, Washington, DC 20037, USA. scallier@gwu.edu
George Washington University · US

Funding

Training ProgramP50HG003390 · NHGRI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI WIESNER, GEORGIA L · 2004 to 2013
$8.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG003390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognizing the profound need for greater patient and provider familiarity with personalized genomic medicine, many university instructors are including personalized genotyping as part of their curricula. During seminars and lectures students run polymerase chain reactions on their own DNA or evaluate their experiences using direct-to-consumer genetic testing services subsidized by the university. By testing for genes that may influence behavioral or health-related traits, however, such as alcohol tolerance and cancer susceptibility, certain universities have stirred debate on the ethical concerns raised by educational genotyping. Considering the potential for psychosocial harm and medically relevant outcomes, how far should university-facilitated DNA testing be permitted to go? The analysis here distinguishes among these learning initiatives and critiques their approaches to the ethical concerns raised by educational genotyping.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideStudentsDNAEducation, Medical, GraduateEducation, Pharmacy, GraduateFacultyGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic ResearchGenetic TestingGenotypeHumansLearningNontherapeutic Human ExperimentationPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNAUniversitiesDNA

Identifiers

PMID22452475
PMCPMC3390747
OpenAlexW2104002750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.