Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22452385›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

The status of pharmacometrics in pregnancy: highlights from the 3(rd) American conference on pharmacometrics.

J G Coen van Hasselt, Marilee A Andrew, Mary F Hebert, Joel Tarning, Paolo Vicini, Donald R Mattison

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Improving Development of Drug Treatments for Pregnant Women and the Fetus.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pharmacokinetics of clomipramine during pregnancy.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J G Coen van HasseltDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. jgc.vanhasselt@gmail.com
Marilee A Andrew
Mary F Hebert
Joel Tarning
Paolo Vicini
Donald R Mattison

Funding

UW Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research UnitU10HD047892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EASTERLING, THOMAS R, HEBERT, MARY F · 2004 to 2014
$9.4M
Intramural NIH HHSNICHD NIH HHS U10 HD047892NICHD NIH HHS U10HD047892Wellcome Trust 089275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiological changes during pregnancy may alter drug pharmacokinetics. Therefore, mechanistic understanding of these changes and, ultimately, clinical studies in pregnant women are necessary to determine if and how dosing regimens should be adjusted. Because of the typically limited number of patients who can be recruited in this patient group, efficient design and analysis of these studies is of special relevance. This paper is a summary of a conference session organized at the American Conference of Pharmacometrics in April 2011, around the topic of applying pharmacometric methodology to this important problem. The discussion included both design and analysis of clinical studies during pregnancy and in silico predictions. An overview of different pharmacometric methods relevant to this subject was given. The impact of pharmacometrics was illustrated using a range of case examples of studies around pregnancy.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacokineticsBiomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationFemaleHumansMaternal-Fetal ExchangeModels, BiologicalPharmacologyPregnancyResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID22452385
PMCPMC3522806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.