Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22451109›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2012

Impacts of nitrogen application rates on the activity and diversity of denitrifying bacteria in the Broadbalk Wheat Experiment.

Ian M Clark, Natalya Buchkina, Deveraj Jhurreea, Keith W T Goulding, Penny R Hirsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effects of silver nanoparticles on the microbial nitrogen cycle: a review of the known risks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Linkage between NScientific reports · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ian M ClarkRothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, UK.
Natalya Buchkina
Deveraj Jhurreea
Keith W T Goulding
Penny R Hirsch
Rothamsted Research · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004961Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00004962Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00006004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial denitrification results in the loss of fertilizer nitrogen and greenhouse gas emissions as nitrous oxides, but ecological factors in soil influencing denitrifier communities are not well understood, impeding the potential for mitigation by land management. Communities vary in the relative abundance of the alternative dissimilatory nitrite reductase genes nirK and nirS, and the nitrous oxide reductase gene nosZ; however, the significance for nitrous oxide emissions is unclear. We assessed the influence of different long-term fertilization and cultivation treatments in a 160-year-old field experiment, comparing the potential for denitrification by soil samples with the size and diversity of their denitrifier communities. Denitrification potential was much higher in soil from an area left to develop from arable into woodland than from a farmyard manure-fertilized arable treatment, which in turn was significantly higher than inorganic nitrogen-fertilized and unfertilized arable plots. This correlated with abundance of nirK but not nirS, the least abundant of the genes tested in all soils, showing an inverse relationship with nirK. Most genetic variation was seen in nirK, where sequences resolved into separate groups according to soil treatment. We conclude that bacteria containing nirK are most probably responsible for the increased denitrification potential associated with nitrogen and organic carbon in this soil.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaBase SequenceDenitrificationDNA, BacterialFertilizersGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataNitrite ReductasesNitrogenOxidoreductasesPhylogenyPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialFertilizersNitrite ReductasesNitrogennitrous oxide reductaseOxidoreductasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID22451109
PMCPMC3306624
OpenAlexW2112363085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.