Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22450948›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2012

First agreement analysis and day-to-day comparison of pharyngeal pH monitoring with pH/impedance monitoring in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Valentin Becker, Simone Graf, Christoph Schlag, Tibor Schuster, Hubertus Feussner, Roland M Schmid, Monther Bajbouj

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01755221 (A Prospective Evaluation of the Utility, Optimal Cutoff and Positive Predictive Value of a Pharyngeal Potential of Hydrogen), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01755221 completednot on this map

A Prospective Evaluation of the Utility, Optimal Cutoff and Positive Predictive Value of a Pharyngeal Potential of Hydrogen (pH) Probe for Predicting Proton Pump Inhibitor Response in Treatment Naive Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

TypeobservationalSponsorNorthwestern UniversityRan2012 to 2016Enrolled42ConditionsLaryngopharyngeal Reflux (LPR), Extraesophageal Reflux, Reflux Laryngitis, Posterior Laryngitis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Alginates and laryngopharyngeal reflux: where we stand. A systematic review.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Magnesium alginate versus proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Salivary pH testing in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A simple qualitative scale for diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux: high correlations with pH measurements and disease severity. The usefulness of the Warsaw Scale in LPR diagnostics compared to other diagnostic tools.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. How I Approach Laryngopharyngoesophageal Reflux (LPR).Current gastroenterology reports · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Pharyngeal reflux episodes in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux versus healthy subjects: a prospective cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Valentin BeckerMedical Department, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, II, Munich, Germany. valentin.becker@gmx.de
Simone Graf
Christoph Schlag
Tibor Schuster
Hubertus Feussner
Roland M Schmid
Monther Bajbouj

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is still challenging. Recently a diagnostic device for pH values in the aerosolized environment of the pharynx has been introduced (Dx-pH). We evaluated results of Dx-pH with objective criteria of pH/impedance monitoring (MII) and subjective reflux scoring systems and assessed day-to-day variability.

designThis study makes use of a prospective single-center trial. Thirty patients with suspected LPR were analyzed. Upper endoscopic examination, manometry, phoniatric examination, and reflux scores were assessed. Dx-pH was performed on two consecutive days, first in combination with MII and second as single measurement. Thereafter, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) trial was performed. Patients were interviewed about symptom relief after 3 months.

resultsThere were considerable differences between MII and results on Dx-pH: day 1 (agreement 11 out of 30, kappa 0.137) and day 2 (agreement 14 out of 30, kappa 0.036). Statistically significant differences were detected correlating all single reflux episodes (n = 453) of Dx-pH with MII and vice versa. Furthermore acidic reflux episodes did not result in pH drops of the pharynx. There was a fair agreement between Dx-pH measurements on subsequent days. After follow-up, 3 out of 18 patients with pathological Dx-pH results reported positive response to PPIs, in contrast to 5 out of 6 patients with pathological MII.

conclusionAccording to our data, acid pharyngeal pH levels detected with Dx-pH are not related to GERD and acid esophageal reflux episodes do not result in pharyngeal pH alterations. Hence, present etiology of LPR needs to be reconsidered since neither mixed nor gas reflux events result in pharyngeal pH alteration. Other acid-producing or retaining factors should be taken into account.

Indexed as

Esophageal pH MonitoringAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectric ImpedanceEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLaryngopharyngeal RefluxMaleManometryMiddle AgedPharynxProton Pump Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.