Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22450540›Full record

ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2012

Ursodeoxycholic acid treatment in a rat model of cancer cachexia.

Anika Tschirner, Stephan von Haehling, Sandra Palus, Wolfram Doehner, Stefan D Anker, Jochen Springer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Probiotics and muscle health: the impact ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Inflammation-induced cholestasis in cancer cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Energy metabolism in cachexia.EMBO reports · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Febuxostat improves outcome in a rat model of cancer cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anika Tschirner
Stephan von Haehling
Sandra Palus
Wolfram Doehner
Stefan D Anker
Jochen Springer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia is characterized by loss of both adipose and skeletal muscle tissue and by an increased production of proinflammatory cytokines. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), a bile acid used for centuries in the treatment of liver disease, is known to confer anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic effects as well as beneficial effects on mitochondrial integrity and cell signaling. We hypothesized that UDCA ameliorates the wasting process in the Yoshida hepatoma tumor model. In addition, we sought to establish if UDCA exerts beneficial effects on survival in this model. METHODS AND

resultsForty-seven male rats were inoculated intraperitoneally with 10(8) Yoshida hepatoma AH-130 cells and treated with placebo or one of two different doses of UDCA, 25 or 100 mg/kg daily. Body weight, body composition, and activity indicators were measured over the course of study up to day 16. UDCA treatment had no effect on tumor growth, loss of body weight, and loss of fat mass. Compared with placebo, low-dose UDCA improved tissue loss in the lung (p = 0.022) and tended to reduce tissue loss in brown adipocytes (p = 0.06), gastrocnemius muscle (p = 0.06), extensor digitorum longus muscle (p = 0.09), and soleus muscle (p = 0.07). Compared with placebo, high-dose UDCA tended to reduce the loss of lean body mass (p = 0.06), lung tissue (p = 0.1), white adipose tissue (p = 0.11), and gastrocnemius muscle (p = 0.11). The activity and food intake were not altered in tumor-bearing rats by either dose of UDCA. Both doses tended to decrease the mortality rate in tumor-bearing rats, (hazard ratio (HR), 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-1.04; p = 0.061 for low-dose UDCA; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.18-1.05; p = 0.065 for high-dose UDCA).

conclusionUDCA treatment in the Yoshida hepatoma model showed a trend towards attenuation of tissue loss in animals with progressive weight loss in cancer cachexia. Tumor growth and activity indicators were not altered. Both doses of UDCA tended to reduce the mortality rates in tumor-bearing animals. Larger studies with longer follow-up are required to verify these findings.

Identifiers

PMID22450540
PMCPMC3302987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.