ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2012
Increasing the pool of deceased donor organs for kidney transplantation.
Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor: A Pleiotropic Molecule for the Potential Diagnosis of and Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Improving deceased donor kidney utilization: predicting risk of nonuse with interpretable models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Impact of Membrane Voltage on Formation and Stability of Human Renal Proximal TubulesACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2022Article
- Predicting Kidney Graft Survival Using Machine Learning Methods: Prediction Model Development and Feature Significance Analysis Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- The impact of country reimbursement programmes on living kidney donations.BMJ global health · 2020Article
- Malignancy after lung transplantation.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Cost-utility analysis in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing kidney transplant; what pays? A systematic review.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2020Review
- Progenitor/Stem Cell Delivery by Suprarenal Aorta Route in Acute Kidney Injury.Cell transplantation · 2019Article
- Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2018Article
- Outcomes of Organ Transplantation from Donors with a Cancer History.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018Article
- Reducing the costs of chronic kidney disease while delivering quality health care: a call to action.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2017Review
- Continuous Normothermic Ex Vivo Kidney Perfusion Improves Graft Function in Donation After Circulatory Death Pig Kidney Transplantation.Transplantation · 2017Article
- Increasing the supply of kidneys for transplantation by making living donors the preferred source of donor kidneys.Medicine · 2014Article
- Geographic determinants of access to pediatric deceased donor kidney transplantation.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2014Article
- Preimplant histologic acute tubular necrosis and allograft outcomes.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014Article
- Liver transplantation: past, present and future.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Review
- Deceased organ donation consent rates among racial and ethnic minorities and older potential donors.Critical care medicine · 2013Article
- Validity of physician billing claims to identify deceased organ donors in large healthcare databases.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expanding the pool of available deceased donor kidneys is critical for improving the outcomes of prospective and current renal transplant candidates. A number of interventions have been proposed that may increase the pool of donors in the US. However, these interventions have variable levels of empirical evidence supporting their potential beneficial impact. Proposed interventions include the instigation of policies for presumed donor consent, the expansion of donor registration, increased quality oversight of transplant providers, financial incentives for donors, increased reimbursement for higher risk donors, alterations in organ allocation policies and distribution, and the selective use of donors with potential or known risk for disease transmission. Many of these interventions have contentious elements that may have delayed or impeded their implementation; however, these options should be considered in the context of the diminishing prognoses for prospective transplant patients, given the increasing scarcity of donor organs relative to the population need. In this Review, we outline the proposed interventions and briefly discuss salient issues that characterize the debates concerning their implementation and effectiveness. Ultimately, any intervention must be based on the best evidence available, with consideration of numerous stakeholders and in conjunction with a careful evaluation of long-term and potential unintended consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22450438What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.