Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22449643›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry2012

Sensitivity and specificity of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder.

James C McPartland, Brian Reichow, Fred R Volkmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Machine Learning Differentiation of Autism Spectrum Sub-Classifications.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Diagnosis of Autism: From Kanner to DSM-III to DSM-5 and Beyond.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Prolonged Auditory Brainstem Response in Universal Hearing Screening of Newborns with Autism Spectrum Disorder.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2021
    Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James C McPartlandYale Child Study Center, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT 06520-7900, USA. james.mcpartland@yale.edu
Brian Reichow
Fred R Volkmar

Funding

TOURETTE'S SYNDROME &RELATED DISORDERS: STUDY OF HIGH DENSITY FAMILIESP01HD003008 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAWARSKA, KATARZYNA · 1985 to 2010
$12.1M
RARE VARIANT GENETICS, CONTACTIN-RELATED PROTEINS AND AUTISMP50MH081756 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GRIGORENKO, ELENA L · 2008 to 2012
$12.1M
Developmental Social Neuroscience in Infants At-Risk for AutismK23MH086785 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCPARTLAND, JAMES CHARLES · 2010 to 2013
$725k
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD003008NICHD NIH HHS P50HD003008NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH086785NIMH NIH HHS K23MH086785NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH081756NIMH NIH HHS P50MH081756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluated the potential impact of proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

methodThe study focused on a sample of 933 participants evaluated during the DSM-IV field trial; 657 carried a clinical diagnosis of an ASD, and 276 were diagnosed with a non-autistic disorder. Sensitivity and specificity for proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria were evaluated using field trial symptom checklists as follows: individual field trial checklist items (e.g., nonverbal communication); checklist items grouped together as described by a single DSM-5 symptom (e.g., nonverbal and verbal communication); individual DSM-5 criterion (e.g., social-communicative impairment); and overall diagnostic criteria.

resultsWhen applying proposed DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD, 60.6% (95% confidence interval: 57%-64%) of cases with a clinical diagnosis of an ASD met revised DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for ASD. Overall specificity was high, with 94.9% (95% confidence interval: 92%-97%) of individuals accurately excluded from the spectrum. Sensitivity varied by diagnostic subgroup (autistic disorder = 0.76; Asperger's disorder = 0.25; pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified = 0.28) and cognitive ability (IQ < 70 = 0.70; IQ ≥ 70 = 0.46).

conclusionsProposed DSM-5 criteria could substantially alter the composition of the autism spectrum. Revised criteria improve specificity but exclude a substantial portion of cognitively able individuals and those with ASDs other than autistic disorder. A more stringent diagnostic rubric holds significant public health ramifications regarding service eligibility and compatibility of historical and future research.

Indexed as

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersAdolescentAsperger SyndromeChecklistChildChild Development Disorders, PervasiveChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDisability EvaluationEligibility DeterminationHumansIncidenceMental Health ServicesSensitivity and SpecificityUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22449643
PMCPMC3424065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.