Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2012
CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 221 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Study of a Rapid "Rule Out" Strategy Using Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) Versus Traditional Care for Low- to Intermediate-Risk Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)
Comparison of Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Acute Chest Pain (EDACS & HEART Pathway) in Emergency Departments of the United Arab Emirates: A Multi-Center Prospective Study
ECG-less Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Management of Patients Presenting With High-troponin Chest Pain
Who cites it
221 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 696 citations in OpenAlex.
- Representation of Older Adults and Women in Randomized Trials of Noninvasive Imaging for Chest Pain.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of non-invasive diagnostic modalities for the detection of coronary artery disease: network meta-analysis of diagnostic randomised controlled trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018Pooled it
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA internal medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison of mid- to long-term clinical outcomes between anatomical testing and usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.Clinical cardiology · 2017Pooled it
- Implementation of standardized assessment and reporting of myocardial infarction in contemporary randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.European heart journal · 2013Pooled it
- Prospective RandOmised Trial of Emergency Cardiac Computerised Tomography (PROTECCT).Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2022Trial
- Presentation cardiac troponin and early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a pre-specified secondary analysis of the RAPID-CTCA trial.European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care · 2022Trial
- Early computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Trial
- Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: Insights from a randomized controlled trial.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020Trial
- Round-the-clock performance of coronary CT angiography for suspected acute coronary syndrome: Results from the BEACON trial.European radiology · 2018Trial
- Comparative effectiveness of coronary CT angiography vs stress cardiac imaging in patients following hospital admission for chest pain work-up: The Prospective First Evaluation in Chest Pain (PERFECT) Trial.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Coronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspective from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: PROMISE.Current cardiology reports · 2016Trial
- Coronary CT Angiography Versus Standard Emergency Department Evaluation for Acute Chest Pain and Diabetic Patients: Is There Benefit With Early Coronary CT Angiography? Results of the Randomized Comparative Effectiveness ROMICAT II Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2016Trial
- Adherence to an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol for Chest Pain: Secondary Analysis of the HEART Pathway Randomized Trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016Trial
- hs-Troponin I Followed by CT Angiography Improves Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification Accuracy and Work-Up in Acute Chest Pain Patients: Results From ROMICAT II Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2015Trial
- Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Chest Pain Admitted to Telemetry: A Randomized Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2015Trial
- Use of coronary artery calcium scanning beyond coronary computed tomographic angiography in the emergency department evaluation for acute chest pain: the ROMICAT II trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2015Trial
- The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2015Trial
161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdmission rates among patients presenting to emergency departments with possible acute coronary syndromes are high, although for most of these patients, the symptoms are ultimately found not to have a cardiac cause. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has a very high negative predictive value for the detection of coronary disease, but its usefulness in determining whether discharge of patients from the emergency department is safe is not well established.
methodsWe randomly assigned low-to-intermediate-risk patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndromes, in a 2:1 ratio, to undergo CCTA or to receive traditional care. Patients were enrolled at five centers in the United States. Patients older than 30 years of age with a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score of 0 to 2 and signs or symptoms warranting admission or testing were eligible. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the subgroup of patients with a negative CCTA examination, with safety defined as the absence of myocardial infarction and cardiac death during the first 30 days after presentation.
resultsWe enrolled 1370 subjects: 908 in the CCTA group and 462 in the group receiving traditional care. The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Of 640 patients with a negative CCTA examination, none died or had a myocardial infarction within 30 days (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 0.57). As compared with patients receiving traditional care, patients in the CCTA group had a higher rate of discharge from the emergency department (49.6% vs. 22.7%; difference, 26.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 21.4 to 32.2), a shorter length of stay (median, 18.0 hours vs. 24.8 hours; P<0.001), and a higher rate of detection of coronary disease (9.0% vs. 3.5%; difference, 5.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 11.2). There was one serious adverse event in each group.
conclusionsA CCTA-based strategy for low-to-intermediate-risk patients presenting with a possible acute coronary syndrome appears to allow the safe, expedited discharge from the emergency department of many patients who would otherwise be admitted. (Funded by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00933400.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.