Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22449295›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2012

CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.

Harold I Litt, Constantine Gatsonis, Brad Snyder, Harjit Singh, Chadwick D Miller, Daniel W Entrikin, James M Leaming, Laurence J Gavin, Charissa B Pacella, Judd E Hollander

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 221 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
70.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00933400 nacompletednot on this map

Randomized Controlled Study of a Rapid "Rule Out" Strategy Using Computed Tomography Coronary Angiogram (CTCA) Versus Traditional Care for Low- to Intermediate-Risk Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Potential Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmerican College of RadiologyRan2009 to 2012Enrolled1,392ConditionsChest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery DiseaseArmsCT Coronary Angiography (CTCA), Traditional Strategy
NCT05532787 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Accelerated Diagnostic Pathways for Acute Chest Pain (EDACS & HEART Pathway) in Emergency Departments of the United Arab Emirates: A Multi-Center Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorZayed Military HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,200ConditionsAcute Coronary Syndrome, Chest PainArmsApplication of acute chest pain risk stratification scores (HEART and EDACS)
NCT07192965 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

ECG-less Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography in the Management of Patients Presenting With High-troponin Chest Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitair Ziekenhuis BrusselRan2025 to 2028Enrolled230ConditionsChest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)ArmsNon-ECG-gated computed tomography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 696 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Clinical significance of incidental findings on coronary CT angiography: Insights from a randomized controlled trial.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Adherence to an Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol for Chest Pain: Secondary Analysis of the HEART Pathway Randomized Trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Harold I LittDepartment of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. harold.litt@uphs.upenn.edu
Constantine Gatsonis
Brad Snyder
Harjit Singh
Chadwick D Miller
Daniel W Entrikin
James M Leaming
Laurence J Gavin
Charissa B Pacella
Judd E Hollander
University of Pennsylvania · USBrown University · USWake Forest University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdmission rates among patients presenting to emergency departments with possible acute coronary syndromes are high, although for most of these patients, the symptoms are ultimately found not to have a cardiac cause. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has a very high negative predictive value for the detection of coronary disease, but its usefulness in determining whether discharge of patients from the emergency department is safe is not well established.

methodsWe randomly assigned low-to-intermediate-risk patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndromes, in a 2:1 ratio, to undergo CCTA or to receive traditional care. Patients were enrolled at five centers in the United States. Patients older than 30 years of age with a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score of 0 to 2 and signs or symptoms warranting admission or testing were eligible. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the subgroup of patients with a negative CCTA examination, with safety defined as the absence of myocardial infarction and cardiac death during the first 30 days after presentation.

resultsWe enrolled 1370 subjects: 908 in the CCTA group and 462 in the group receiving traditional care. The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Of 640 patients with a negative CCTA examination, none died or had a myocardial infarction within 30 days (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 0.57). As compared with patients receiving traditional care, patients in the CCTA group had a higher rate of discharge from the emergency department (49.6% vs. 22.7%; difference, 26.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 21.4 to 32.2), a shorter length of stay (median, 18.0 hours vs. 24.8 hours; P<0.001), and a higher rate of detection of coronary disease (9.0% vs. 3.5%; difference, 5.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 11.2). There was one serious adverse event in each group.

conclusionsA CCTA-based strategy for low-to-intermediate-risk patients presenting with a possible acute coronary syndrome appears to allow the safe, expedited discharge from the emergency department of many patients who would otherwise be admitted. (Funded by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00933400.).

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyAcute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedConfidence IntervalsCoronary DiseaseFemaleHealth ResourcesHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient DischargeTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID22449295
OpenAlexW2116197220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.