Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22449134›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2012

Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.

Solène Kalénine, Daniel Mirman, Erica L Middleton, Laurel J Buxbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.Psychological bulletin · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Doctor, Teacher, and Stethoscope: Neural Representation of Different Types of Semantic Relations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Solène KalénineMoss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Solene.kaleni@univ-lille3.fr
Daniel Mirman
Erica L Middleton
Laurel J Buxbaum

Funding

Dynamics of Spoken Word Comprehension in AphasiaR01DC010805 · NIDCD · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI MIRMAN, DANIEL · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Understanding the Conceptual-Motor InterfaceR01NS065049 · NINDS · ALBERT EINSTEIN HEALTHCARE NETWORK · PI BUXBAUM, LAUREL J · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010805NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC010805NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065049NINDS NIH HHS R01-NS065049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current research aimed at specifying the activation time course of different types of semantic information during object conceptual processing and the effect of context on this time course. We distinguished between thematic and functional knowledge and the specificity of functional similarity. Two experiments were conducted with healthy older adults using eye tracking in a word-to-picture matching task. The time course of gaze fixations was used to assess activation of distractor objects during the identification of manipulable artifact targets (e.g., broom). Distractors were (a) thematically related (e.g., dustpan), (b) related by a specific function (e.g., vacuum cleaner), or (c) related by a general function (e.g., sponge). Growth curve analyses were used to assess competition effects when target words were presented in isolation (Experiment 1) and embedded in contextual sentences of different generality levels (Experiment 2). In the absence of context, there was earlier and shorter lasting activation of thematically related as compared to functionally related objects. The time course difference was more pronounced for general functions than specific functions. When contexts were provided, functional similarities that were congruent with context generality level increased in salience with earlier activation of those objects. Context had little impact on thematic activation time course. These data demonstrate that processing a single manipulable artifact concept implicitly activates thematic and functional knowledge with different time courses and that context speeds activation of context-congruent functional similarity.

Indexed as

ArtifactsPersonalitySemanticsAcoustic StimulationAgedAttentionChi-Square DistributionConcept FormationFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID22449134
PMCPMC3537173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.