Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22449119›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2012

Priority setting of ICU resources in an influenza pandemic: a qualitative study of the Canadian public's perspectives.

Diego S Silva, Jennifer L Gibson, Ann Robertson, Cécile M Bensimon, Sachin Sahni, Laena Maunula, Maxwell J Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A framework for critical care triage during a major surge in critical illness.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Ethical dilemmas due to the Covid-19 pandemic.Annals of intensive care · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The Critical Care Society of Southern Africa Consensus Statement on ICU Triage and Rationing (ConICTri).The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. In defense of (some) altered standards of care for Ebola infections in developed countries.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Diego S SilvaDalla Lana School of Public Health and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 754, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada.
Jennifer L Gibson
Ann Robertson
Cécile M Bensimon
Sachin Sahni
Laena Maunula
Maxwell J Smith

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPandemic influenza may exacerbate existing scarcity of life-saving medical resources. As a result, decision-makers may be faced with making tough choices about who will receive care and who will have to wait or go without. Although previous studies have explored ethical issues in priority setting from the perspective of clinicians and policymakers, there has been little investigation into how the public views priority setting during a pandemic influenza, in particular related to intensive care resources.

methodsTo bridge this gap, we conducted three public town hall meetings across Canada to explore Canadian's perspectives on this ethical challenge. Town hall discussions group discussions were digitally recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsSix interrelated themes emerged from the town hall discussions related to: ethical and empirical starting points for deliberation; criteria for setting priorities; pre-crisis planning; in-crisis decision-making; the need for public deliberation and input; and participants' deliberative struggle with the ethical issues.

conclusionsOur findings underscore the importance of public consultation in pandemic planning for sustaining public trust in a public health emergency. Participants appreciated the empirical and ethical uncertainty of decision-making in an influenza pandemic and demonstrated nuanced ethical reasoning about priority setting of intensive care resources in an influenza pandemic. Policymakers may benefit from a better understanding the public's empirical and ethical 'starting points' in developing effective pandemic plans.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesInfluenza, HumanIntensive Care UnitsPandemicsCanadaHumans

Identifiers

PMID22449119
PMCPMC3331804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.