ArticleBMC cancer2012
Prognostic significance of anti-p53 and anti-KRas circulating antibodies in esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.
Article in BMC cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor marker, 2nd edition review part 2.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Guideline
- Value of anti-p53 antibody as a biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from a meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of tumor biomarkers in predicting prognosis in esophageal cancer.BMC cancer · 2013Pooled it
- Clinical utility of anti-p53 auto-antibody: systematic review and focus on colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for molecular tumor markers, 2nd edition review part 1.International journal of clinical oncology · 2024Article
- The Glycolytic Pathway as a Target for Novel Onco-Immunology Therapies in Pancreatic Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a Liquid Biopsy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2020Review
- p53 overexpression is a prognosticator of poor outcome in esophageal cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- p53 molecular approach to diagnosis and treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2018Review
- Study of apoptosis-related interactions in colorectal cancer.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2016Review
- Proteomic mapping of p53 immunogenicity in pancreatic, ovarian, and breast cancers.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2016Article
- Article
- DNA vaccine elicits an efficient antitumor response by targeting the mutant Kras in a transgenic mouse lung cancer model.Gene therapy · 2014Article
- Harnessing the immune system to provide long-term survival in patients with melanoma and other solid tumors.Oncoimmunology · 2014Review
- Oesophageal cancer--an overview.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundP53 mutations are an adverse prognostic factor in esophageal cancer. P53 and KRas mutations are involved in chemo-radioresistance. Circulating anti-p53 or anti-KRas antibodies are associated with gene mutations. We studied whether anti-p53 or anti-KRas auto-antibodies were prognostic factors for response to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or survival in esophageal carcinoma.
methodsSerum p53 and KRas antibodies (abs) were measured using an ELISA method in 97 consecutive patients treated at Saint Louis University Hospital between 1999 and 2002 with CRT for esophageal carcinoma (squamous cell carcinoma (SCCE) 57 patients, adenocarcinoma (ACE) 27 patients). Patient and tumor characteristics, response to treatment and the follow-up status of 84 patients were retrospectively collected. The association between antibodies and patient characteristics was studied. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted.
resultsTwenty-four patients (28%) had anti-p53 abs. Abs were found predominantly in SCCE (p = 0.003). Anti-p53 abs were associated with a shorter overall survival in the univariate analysis (HR 1.8 [1.03-2.9], p = 0.04). In the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors for overall and progression-free survival were an objective response to CRT, the CRT strategy (alone or combined with surgery [preoperative]) and anti-p53 abs. None of the long-term survivors had p53 abs. KRas abs were found in 19 patients (23%, no difference according to the histological type). There was no significant association between anti-KRas abs and survival neither in the univariate nor in the multivariate analysis. Neither anti-p53 nor anti-KRas abs were associated with response to CRT.
conclusionsAnti-p53 abs are an independent prognostic factor for esophageal cancer patients treated with CRT. Individualized therapeutic approaches should be evaluated in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.