Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22448223›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Layer-specific fMRI reflects different neuronal computations at different depths in human V1.

Cheryl A Olman, Noam Harel, David A Feinberg, Sheng He, Peng Zhang, Kamil Ugurbil, Essa Yacoub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Easy-to-useMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Closed-loop fMRI at the mesoscopic scale of columns and layers: Can we do it and why would we want to?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cheryl A OlmanCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Noam Harel
David A Feinberg
Sheng He
Peng Zhang
Kamil Ugurbil
Essa Yacoub

Funding

ZOOMED FUNCT IMAGING IN HUMAN BRAIN AT 7T W/ SIMULT HIGH SPATIAL &TEMPORAL RESP41RR008079 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI DUBINSKY, JANET M · 1993 to 2011
$16.3M
VOLTAMMETRIC DETECTION OF METAL IONSP41RR001395 · NCRR · MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY · PI SMITH, PETER JS · 1985 to 2010
$12.7M
Neuroscience Cores For MR Studies of the BrainP30NS057091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2006 to 2011
$8.5M
FUNCTIONAL MRI IN HUMANS AT 7 TESLAR01EB000331 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI YACOUB, ESSA · 2002 to 2010
$2.6M
Object Perception: Mechanisms for the Resolution of AmbiguityR01EY015261 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HE, SHENG, KERSTEN, DANIEL J · 2004 to 2010
$2.2M
fMRI ABILITY TO MAP COLUMNAR STRUCTURES IN HUMANSR01MH070800 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI YACOUB, ESSA · 2004 to 2008
$1.6M
Correlation of Functional and Structural Units in Cerebral CortexR01EB008645 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HAREL, NOAM · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
Development of Sub-second 3D Pulse Sequences for FMRI in NeurosciencesR44NS063537 · NINDS · ADVANCED MRI TECHNOLOGY, LLC · PI FEINBERG, DAVID ALAN · 2008 to 2010
$850k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR001395NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008079NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR08079NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR1395NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015261NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000331NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008645NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH070800NINDS NIH HHS 1R44NS063537NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057091NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS063537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent work has established that cerebral blood flow is regulated at a spatial scale that can be resolved by high field fMRI to show cortical columns in humans. While cortical columns represent a cluster of neurons with similar response properties (spanning from the pial surface to the white matter), important information regarding neuronal interactions and computational processes is also contained within a single column, distributed across the six cortical lamina. A basic understanding of underlying neuronal circuitry or computations may be revealed through investigations of the distribution of neural responses at different cortical depths. In this study, we used T(2)-weighted imaging with 0.7 mm (isotropic) resolution to measure fMRI responses at different depths in the gray matter while human subjects observed images with either recognizable or scrambled (physically impossible) objects. Intact and scrambled images were partially occluded, resulting in clusters of activity distributed across primary visual cortex. A subset of the identified clusters of voxels showed a preference for scrambled objects over intact; in these clusters, the fMRI response in middle layers was stronger during the presentation of scrambled objects than during the presentation of intact objects. A second experiment, using stimuli targeted at either the magnocellular or the parvocellular visual pathway, shows that laminar profiles in response to parvocellular-targeted stimuli peak in more superficial layers. These findings provide new evidence for the differential sensitivity of high-field fMRI to modulations of the neural responses at different cortical depths.

Indexed as

Brain MappingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultCerebral CortexCerebrovascular CirculationData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleNeuronsOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22448223
PMCPMC3308958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.