Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22447866›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Muller cell expression of genes implicated in proliferative vitreoretinopathy is influenced by substrate elastic modulus.

Joshua T Davis, Qi Wen, Paul A Janmey, Deborah C Otteson, William J Foster

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The Proteome of Preretinal Tissue in Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina · 2021
    Article
  14. Computational Fluid Dynamics of Intraocular Silicone Oil Tamponade.Translational vision science & technology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joshua T DavisDepartment of Physics, The University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Qi Wen
Paul A Janmey
Deborah C Otteson
William J Foster
Astronomy and Space · AUHouston Methodist · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Research Programming ModuleP30EY007551 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI GEUNYOUNG YOON · 1988 to 2026
$16.4M
Mechanical control of cell growth and differentiationR01GM083272 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JANMEY, PAUL A · 2008 to 2011
$2.0M
The application of nanotechnology to the retinaK08EY017112 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI FOSTER, WILLIAM JOSEPH · 2006 to 2010
$950k
NEI NIH HHS EY007551NEI NIH HHS EY017112NEI NIH HHS K08 EY017112NEI NIH HHS P30 EY007551NIGMS NIH HHS GM083272NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMatrix stiffness is recognized increasingly as a significant factor in cell and tissue function. To understand better the mechanosensitivity of Müller cells and its association with vitreoretinal disorders, we examined morphology, propagation, and expression of genes in Müller cells that were cultured on substrates of varying elastic moduli.

methodsA conditionally immortalized mouse Müller cell line was cultured on laminin-coated polyacrylamide substrates with calibrated Young's moduli. Glass was used as a control. Phase contrast, fluorescence, and atomic force microscopy were used to study cell morphology and propagation. Expression of extracellular matrix (ECM) genes was analyzed using quantitative reverse-transcription PCR.

resultsThe adherent area, stiffness, and propagation of Müller cells all are affected by matrix stiffness, but to different extents and with different ranges of sensitivity. Of 85 ECM genes tested 11 showed a continuous >4-fold increase or decrease in mRNA expression as a function of the substrate elastic modulus. The changes were statistically significant in four genes: connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf, P = 0.04), tenascin C (Tnc, P = 0.035), Collagen Iα1 (Col1a1, P = 0.0001), and Collagen IVα3 (Col4a3, P = 0.05), with all showing increased expression on softer substrates.

conclusionsThere are significant changes in morphology, cytoskeletal integrity, and gene regulation in Müller cells as a function of the stiffness of the substrate. Changes in local tissue elastic modulus may have a role in vitreoretinal disorders. These findings also may have implications for strategies for improved integration of retinal prosthetics, and for stem cell therapies, particularly targeting the transcriptional regulators YAP and TAZ.

Indexed as

Acrylic ResinsAnimalsAutoantigensCell Culture TechniquesCells, CulturedCollagen Type ICollagen Type IVConnective Tissue Growth FactorElastic ModulusExtracellular MatrixGene ExpressionLamininMiceMicroscopyPolyacrylamidesRetinaAcrylic ResinsAutoantigensCollagen Type ICollagen Type IVConnective Tissue Growth FactorLamininPolyacrylamidesRNA, MessengerTenascintype IV collagen alpha3 chain

Identifiers

PMID22447866
PMCPMC3378084
OpenAlexW2084527892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.