Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22447607›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2012

Zoonotic agents in small ruminants kept on city farms in southern Germany.

Anna-Katarina Schilling, Helmut Hotzel, Ulrich Methner, Lisa D Sprague, Gernot Schmoock, Hosny El-Adawy, Ralf Ehricht, Anna-Caroline Wöhr, Michael Erhard, Lutz Geue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna-Katarina SchillingDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helmut Hotzel
Ulrich Methner
Lisa D Sprague
Gernot Schmoock
Hosny El-Adawy
Ralf Ehricht
Anna-Caroline Wöhr
Michael Erhard
Lutz Geue

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sheep and goats are popular examples of livestock kept on city farms. In these settings, close contacts between humans and animals frequently occur. Although it is widely accepted that small ruminants can carry numerous zoonotic agents, it is unknown which of these agents actually occur in sheep and goats on city farms in Germany. We sampled feces and nasal liquid of 48 animals (28 goats, 20 sheep) distributed in 7 city farms and on one activity playground in southern Germany. We found that 100% of the sampled sheep and 89.3% of the goats carried Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC). The presence of Staphylococcus spp. in 75% of both sheep and goats could be demonstrated. Campylobacter spp. were detected in 25% and 14.3% of the sheep and goats, respectively. Neither Salmonella spp. nor Coxiella burnetii was found. On the basis of these data, we propose a reasonable hygiene scheme to prevent transmission of zoonotic agents during city farm visits.

Indexed as

ZoonosesAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCampylobacterCitiesDisease Transmission, InfectiousFecesGermanyGoatsHumansHygieneNasal CavityRuminantsSheepShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliStaphylococcus

Identifiers

PMID22447607
PMCPMC3346384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.