ArticleEuropean radiology2012
The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction.
Article in European radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Article
- Left Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction-Pathophysiology, Diagnostic Approach and Management During Cardiac Rehabilitation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pregnancy-Related Cardiovascular Diseases: A Radiological Overview.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- COPD and acute myocardial infarction.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020Review
- Prognostic implications of post-percutaneous coronary intervention neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio on infarct size and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Prognosis-based definition of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.European radiology · 2019Observational
- Predictors of left ventricular remodeling after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2017Article
- Assessment of the longitudinal changes in infarct heterogeneity post myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Article
- Magnetic resonance-derived circumferential strain provides a superior and incremental assessment of improvement in contractile function in patients early after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.European radiology · 2014Article
- Myocarditis with fulminant type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a case report.BMC research notes · 2013Article
- Macrocyclic contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine.European radiology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvances in the management of myocardial infarction have resulted in substantial reductions in morbidity and mortality.
methodsHowever, after acute treatment a number of diagnostic and prognostic questions often remain to be answered, whereby cardiac imaging plays an essential role.
resultsFor example, some patients will sustain early mechanical complications after infarction, while others may develop significant ventricular dysfunction. Furthermore, many individuals harbour a significant burden of residual coronary disease for which clarification of functional ischaemic status and/or viability of the suspected myocardial territory is required.
conclusionCardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is well positioned to fulfil these requirements given its unparalleled capability in evaluating cardiac function, stress ischaemia testing and myocardial tissue characterisation. This review will focus on the utility of CMR in resolving diagnostic uncertainty, evaluating early complications following myocardial infarction, assessing inducible ischaemia, myocardial viability, ventricular remodelling and the emerging role of CMR-derived measures as endpoints in clinical trials. KEY POINTS: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging identifies early complications after myocardial infarction. • Adenosine stress CMR can reliably assess co-existing disease in non-culprit arteries. • Assessment of infarct size and microvascular obstruction a robust prognostic indicator. • Assessment of myocardial viability is important to guide revascularisation decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.