Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22447355›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2012

Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: difficulties in comparing CT enterography and video capsule endoscopy.

Philippe Soyer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation and outcomes of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  7. Small bowel bleeding: a comprehensive review.Gastroenterology report · 2014
    Review
  8. Update on imaging of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Philippe SoyerDepartment of Imaging & Nuclear Medicine, Hôpital Lariboisière-APHP 2, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010 Paris, France. philippe.soyer@lrb.aphp.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledA paper reports the results of a retrospective study that was designed to evaluate the potential role of video capsule endoscopy (VCE) in elucidating the cause of bleeding in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) for whom CT enterography was negative. The authors highlight the limitations of dual-phase CT enterography for the detection of flat lesions of the small bowel such as ulcers, angiodysplasias or arteriovenous malformations, and confirm the superiority of VCE for the detection of this category of lesions. This commentary discusses some of the issues raised. KEY POINTS: • Video capsule endoscopy surpasses CT enterography in detecting flat small bowel lesions. • Retrospective VCE and CT enterography findings in obscure bleeding need further evaluation. • A fair and unbiased comparison of the two investigations is still needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCapsule EndoscopyChildFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.