Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22447213›Full record

Trial reportJournal of epidemiology2012

A randomized controlled trial of short and standard-length consent forms for a genetic cohort study: is longer better?

Kenji Matsui, Reidar K Lie, Tanvir C Turin, Yoshikuni Kita

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Permission form synopses to improve parents' understanding of research: a randomized trial.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2013
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evidence-Based Strategies for Shortening Informed Consent Forms in Clinical Research.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kenji MatsuiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiologic Informatics Office for Research Ethics, The National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan. kjmatsui@res.ncvc.go.jp
Reidar K Lie
Tanvir C Turin
Yoshikuni Kita

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the amount of detail in informed consent documents has increased over time and the documents have therefore become very long, there is little research on whether longer informed consent documents actually result in (1) better informed research subjects or (2) higher consent rates. We therefore conducted an add-on randomized controlled trial to the Takashima Study, a prospective Japanese population-based genetic cohort study, to test the hypothesis that a shorter informed consent form would satisfy both of the above goals.

methodsStandard (10 459 words, 11 pages) and short (3602 words, 5 pages) consent forms in Japanese were developed and distributed using cluster-randomization to 293 potential cohort subjects living in 9 medico-social units and 288 subjects in 8 medico-social units, respectively.

resultsFew differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to outcome measures, including participants' self-perceived understanding, recall of information, concerns, voluntariness, trust, satisfaction, sense of duty, and consent rates.

conclusionsA short informed consent form was no less valid than a standard form with regard to fulfilling ethical requirements and securing the scientific validity of research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesConsent FormsFemaleGenetic ResearchHumansInformed ConsentMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsResearch Subjects

Identifiers

PMID22447213
PMCPMC3798649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.