ReviewHeart failure reviews2013
Rodent models of heart failure: an updated review.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hemodynamic characterization of cardiac dysfunction after traumatic brain injury using a controlled cortical impact model in male rats.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Glycoursodeoxycholic acid 3 sulfate sodium links hemodynamics and bile acid metabolism in aortic stenosis.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Free-Breathing Gating-Free Extracellular Cellular Volume Quantification for Repetitive Myocardial Fibrosis Evaluation in Rodents.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Exploring the Potential of Molecular Hydrogen in Different Heart Failure Models: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Breast cancer progression in the presence of treated and untreated left ventricular dysfunction.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Opposite effects of GαNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Article
- Sex based cardiovascular differences in adult and middle-aged hypertensive schlager mice.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Retinoic acid signaling and metabolism in heart failure.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2025Review
- Isoproterenol induced cardiac hypertrophy: A comparison of three doses and two delivery methods in C57BL/6J mice.PloS one · 2024Article
- Torsional and strain dysfunction precede overt heart failure in a mouse model of dilated cardiomyopathy pathogenesis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Experimental heart failure models in small animals.Heart failure reviews · 2023Review
- Suppression of RBFox2 by Multiple MiRNAs in Pressure Overload-Induced Heart Failure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A review on experimental surgical models and anesthetic protocols of heart failure in rats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Review
- Development and validation of risk prediction and neural network models for dilated cardiomyopathy based on WGCNA.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- A novel mouse model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction after chronic kidney disease induced by retinol through JAK/STAT pathway.International journal of biological sciences · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Pre-clinical Animal Models in Addition to Herbal Treatment Options and Multi-modality Imaging Strategies.Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets · 2023Review
- Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Heterogeneous Syndrome, Diverse Preclinical Models.Circulation research · 2022Review
- Metabolomic and transcriptomic signatures of chemogenetic heart failure.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Article
- ESC working group on cardiac cellular electrophysiology position paper: relevance, opportunities, and limitations of experimental models for cardiac electrophysiology research.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021Review
- Reciprocal organ interactions during heart failure: a position paper from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial Function.Cardiovascular research · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is one of the major health and economic burdens worldwide, and its prevalence is continuously increasing. The study of HF requires reliable animal models to study the chronic changes and pharmacologic interventions in myocardial structure and function and to follow its progression toward HF. Indeed, during the past 40 years, basic and translational scientists have used small animal models to understand the pathophysiology of HF and find more efficient ways of preventing and managing patients suffering from congestive HF (CHF). Each species and each animal model has advantages and disadvantages, and the choice of one model over another should take them into account for a good experimental design. The aim of this review is to describe and highlight the advantages and drawbacks of some commonly used HF rodents models, including both non-genetically and genetically engineered models, with a specific subchapter concerning diastolic HF models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.