Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22446857›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2012

Typhoid fever & vaccine development: a partially answered question.

Sandhya A Marathe, Amit Lahiri, Vidya Devi Negi, Dipshikha Chakravortty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Typhoid fever: Control & challenges in India.The Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Review
  7. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vaccination withVeterinary world · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Combination vaccines against diarrheal diseases.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandhya A MaratheDepartment of Microbiology & Cell Biology, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India.
Amit Lahiri
Vidya Devi Negi
Dipshikha Chakravortty
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Typhoid fever is a systemic disease caused by the human specific Gram-negative pathogen Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi). The extra-intestinal infections caused by Salmonella are very fatal. The incidence of typhoid fever remains very high in impoverished areas and the emergence of multidrug resistance has made the situation worse. To combat and to reduce the morbidity and mortality caused by typhoid fever, many preventive measures and strategies have been employed, the most important being vaccination. In recent years, many Salmonella vaccines have been developed including live attenuated as well as DNA vaccines and their clinical trials have shown encouraging results. But with the increasing antibiotic resistance, the development of potent vaccine candidate for typhoid fever is a need of the hour. This review discusses the latest trends in the typhoid vaccine development and the clinical trials which are underway.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug Resistance, MultipleHumansPolysaccharides, BacterialSalmonella InfectionsSalmonella typhiTyphoid FeverTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAPolysaccharides, BacterialTyphoid-Paratyphoid VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVi polysaccharide vaccine, typhoid

Identifiers

PMID22446857
PMCPMC3336846
OpenAlexW2101698593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.