Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22446292›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2012

Optimizing terminology for stroke motor rehabilitation: recommendations from the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Stroke Movement Interventions Subcommittee.

Stephen J Page, Arlene Schmid, Jocelyn E Harris

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Stroke rehabilitation. A call to action in Saudi Arabia.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. A taxonomy of voice therapy.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen J PageSchool of Allied Medical Professions, and the Neuromotor Recovery and Rehabilitation Laboratory (the RehabLab) at the School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Stephen.Page@osumc.edu
Arlene Schmid
Jocelyn E Harris

Funding

Mental Practice in Chronic, Stroke-Induced HemiparesisR01AT004454 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PAGE, STEPHEN J. · 2009 to 2013
$3.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT004454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As knowledge and interest in stroke motor rehabilitation continue to increase, consistent terminologies that are specific to this discipline must be established. Such language is critical to effective rehabilitative team communication, and is important to facilitating communication among the diverse groups interested in the science and practice of stroke motor rehabilitation. The purpose of this article is to provide operational definitions for 3 concepts that are common-and commonly mislabeled-attributes of stroke motor rehabilitation interventions: intensity, duration, and frequency. In developing these guidelines, conceptual frameworks used in the pharmaceutical, exercise, and rehabilitative therapy realms were used. Implications of these definitions for research and clinical practice are also discussed.

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationTerminology as TopicHumansOccupational TherapyParesisPractice Guidelines as TopicResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID22446292
PMCPMC3413452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.