Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22445485›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2012

Embryonic stem cells induce pluripotency in somatic cell fusion through biphasic reprogramming.

Kara M Foshay, Timothy J Looney, Sheila Chari, Frank Fuxiang Mao, Jae Hyun Lee, Li Zhang, Croydon J Fernandes, Samuel W Baker, Kayla L Clift, Jedidiah Gaetz and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cell Fusion in Reprogramming and Regeneration.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Molecular features of cellular reprogramming and development.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2016
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Epigenetics of cellular reprogramming.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kara M FoshayDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Timothy J Looney
Sheila Chari
Frank Fuxiang Mao
Jae Hyun Lee
Li Zhang
Croydon J Fernandes
Samuel W Baker
Kayla L Clift
Jedidiah Gaetz
Chun-Guang Di
Andy Peng Xiang
Bruce T Lahn
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Chicago · USSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

PREDOCTORAL TRAINING IN GENETICS AND REGULATIONT32GM007197 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROTHMAN-DENES, LUCIA B. B · 1985 to 2020
$17.0M
Loss of Deocclusion Ability During Mammalian DevelopmentF32HD061205 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI FOSHAY, KARA M · 2009 to 2011
$158k
NHLBI NIH HHS F32HL922792NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD061205NICHD NIH HHS F32HD061205NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a long-held paradigm that cell fusion reprograms gene expression but the extent of reprogramming and whether it is affected by the cell types employed remain unknown. We recently showed that the silencing of somatic genes is attributable to either trans-acting cellular environment or cis-acting chromatin context. Here, we examine how trans- versus cis-silenced genes in a somatic cell type behave in fusions to another somatic cell type or to embryonic stem cells (ESCs). We demonstrate that while reprogramming of trans-silenced somatic genes occurs in both cases, reprogramming of cis-silenced somatic genes occurs only in somatic-ESC fusions. Importantly, ESCs reprogram the somatic genome in two distinct phases: trans-reprogramming occurs rapidly, independent of DNA replication, whereas cis-reprogramming occurs with slow kinetics requiring DNA replication. We also show that pluripotency genes Oct4 and Nanog are cis-silenced in somatic cells. We conclude that cis-reprogramming capacity is a fundamental feature distinguishing ESCs from somatic cells.

Indexed as

Cell FusionAnimalsCell DifferentiationDNA ReplicationEmbryonic Stem CellsGene SilencingKineticsMicePluripotent Stem Cells

Identifiers

PMID22445485
PMCPMC4955287
OpenAlexW2002637806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.