Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22445104›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2012

The generation of chromosomal deletions to provide extensive coverage and subdivision of the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

R Kimberley Cook, Stacey J Christensen, Jennifer A Deal, Rachel A Coburn, Megan E Deal, Jill M Gresens, Thomas C Kaufman, Kevin R Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role ofBiology · 2025
    Article
  11. CRIF counteracts oncogenic Ras and regulates heterochromatin.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Engineering drive-selection balance for localized population suppression with neutral dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ThemicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  19. The genetic mapping and phenotypic analysis ofmicroPublication biology · 2025
    Article
  20. microPublication biology · 2025
    Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

R Kimberley CookBloomington Drosophila Stock Center, Department of Biology, Indiana University, 47405, USA.
Stacey J Christensen
Jennifer A Deal
Rachel A Coburn
Megan E Deal
Jill M Gresens
Thomas C Kaufman
Kevin R Cook

Funding

GENOMIC DELETION AND DUPLICATION COVERAGE IN DROSOPHILAR24RR014106 · NCRR · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, KEVIN R · 1999 to 2010
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR014106NCRR NIH HHS RR014106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromosomal deletions are used extensively in Drosophila melanogaster genetics research. Deletion mapping is the primary method used for fine-scale gene localization. Effective and efficient deletion mapping requires both extensive genomic coverage and a high density of molecularly defined breakpoints across the genome.

resultsA large-scale resource development project at the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center has improved the choice of deletions beyond that provided by previous projects. FLP-mediated recombination between FRT-bearing transposon insertions was used to generate deletions, because it is efficient and provides single-nucleotide resolution in planning deletion screens. The 793 deletions generated pushed coverage of the euchromatic genome to 98.4%. Gaps in coverage contain haplolethal and haplosterile genes, but the sizes of these gaps were minimized by flanking these genes as closely as possible with deletions. In improving coverage, a complete inventory of haplolethal and haplosterile genes was generated and extensive information on other haploinsufficient genes was compiled. To aid mapping experiments, a subset of deletions was organized into a Deficiency Kit to provide maximal coverage efficiently. To improve the resolution of deletion mapping, screens were planned to distribute deletion breakpoints evenly across the genome. The median chromosomal interval between breakpoints now contains only nine genes and 377 intervals contain only single genes.

conclusionsDrosophila melanogaster now has the most extensive genomic deletion coverage and breakpoint subdivision as well as the most comprehensive inventory of haploinsufficient genes of any multicellular organism. The improved selection of chromosomal deletion strains will be useful to nearly all Drosophila researchers.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionGenome, InsectAnimalsChromosome BreakpointsChromosome MappingChromosomesDNA Transposable ElementsDrosophila melanogasterGenomicsHaploinsufficiencyHaplotypesDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID22445104
PMCPMC3439972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.