Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22444722›Full record

Trial reportClinical breast cancer2012

Phase II trial of exemestane in combination with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with advanced, hormone-responsive breast cancer.

Ewa Mrózek, Rachel Layman, Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy, Larry Schaaf, Xiaobai Li, Susan Ottman, Charles L Shapiro

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical breast cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00201864 (Phase II Trial of Exemestane), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00201864 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Trial of Exemestane (Aromasin) in Combination With Fulvestrant (Faslodex) in Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Sensitive Advanced Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorOhio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterRan2005 to 2014Enrolled40ConditionsBreast CancerArmsExemestane, Fulvestrant
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ewa MrózekDivision of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. ewa.mrozek@osumc.edu
Rachel Layman
Bhuvaneswari Ramaswamy
Larry Schaaf
Xiaobai Li
Susan Ottman
Charles L Shapiro
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USThe Ohio State University · USThe Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center – Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExemestane, the irreversible steroidal aromatase inhibitor, and fulvestrant, the pure estrogen antagonist, are active as single drugs in postmenopausal women with advanced hormone-responsive breast cancer. We designed a phase II study with the purpose of determining whether combining these 2 drugs with different and potentially complementary mechanisms of action will improve the clinical benefit. PATIENTS AND

methodsForty postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive advanced breast cancer received intramuscular injection of fulvestrant 250 mg every 28 days in combination with daily exemestane 25 mg until disease progression. We examined the influence of fulvestrant on exemestane pharmacokinetics and the effect of exemestane and fulvestrant on serum IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor 1) and IGFBP-3 (IGF-binding protein 3) levels.

resultsThe observed proportion of patients free of progressive disease at 6 months after the initiation of treatment with exemestane and fulvestrant was 50%, a rate similar to that achieved with single-agent exemestane or fulvestrant in the first- or second-line setting. Pharmacokinetics parameters showed that coadministration of fulvestrant did not result in clinically relevant changes in exemestane plasma concentrations. A comparison of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 levels demonstrated the increase of 35% and 12%, respectively, in mean levels from baseline to day 120.

conclusionsThe combination of exemestane and fulvestrant did not improve clinical benefit. The observed lack of improved efficacy was not related to altered drug exposure.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAndrostadienesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsEstradiolFemaleFulvestrantHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IMiddle AgedPostmenopauseReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneAndrostadienesEstradiolexemestaneFulvestrantInsulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3Insulin-Like Growth Factor IReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID22444722
PMCPMC5003403
OpenAlexW2068424985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.