Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22444525›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2012

Tissue engineering 2.0: guiding self-organization during pluripotent stem cell differentiation.

Curtis Woodford, Peter W Zandstra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Building Complex Life Through Self-Organization.Tissue engineering. Part A · 2019
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Engineering liver.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2014
    Review
  15. Localized cell death focuses mechanical forces during 3D patterning in a biofilm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Curtis WoodfordInstitute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G9, Canada.
Peter W Zandstra

Funding

Generation of functional beta cells from stem and progenitor cellsU01DK089561 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI KELLER, GORDON, STREETER, PHILIP R · 2010 to 2014
$3.9M
CIHRNIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK089561NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK 089561-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) differentiation aims to mimic development using growth factors or small molecules in a time-dependent and dose-dependent manner. However, the cell types produced using this approach are predominantly fetal-like in phenotype and function, limiting their use in regenerative medicine. This is particularly true in current efforts to produce pancreatic beta cells, wherein robust pancreatic progenitor maturation can only be accomplished upon transplantation into mice. Recent studies have suggested that hPSC-derived cells are capable of self-organizing in vitro, revealing a new paradigm for creating mature cells and tissues. Tissue engineering strategies that provide subtle and dynamic signals to developmentally naïve cells may be applied to mimic in vitro the self-organization aspects of pancreatic development.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCell MovementEndotheliumEpithelial CellsGastrulationHumansInsulin-Secreting CellsMesodermPancreasPluripotent Stem CellsRegenerative MedicineTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID22444525
PMCPMC3392530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.