Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22443419›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2012

Eggs, ethics and exploitation? Investigating women's experiences of an egg sharing scheme.

Erica Haimes, Ken Taylor, Ilke Turkmendag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Invisible Patient: Concerns about Donor Exploitation in Stem Cell Research.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Scientific and Ethical Issues in Mitochondrial Donation.The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Challenges to ART market: a Polish case.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erica HaimesPolicy, Ethics and Life Sciences (PEALS) Research Centre, Newcastle University, Fourth Floor Claremont Bridge, Newcastle uponTyne, NE1 7RU. erica.haimes@ncl.ac.uk
Ken Taylor
Ilke Turkmendag

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing global demand for human eggs for the treatment of sub-fertile women and for stem cell-related research. This demand provokes concerns for the women providing the eggs, including their possible exploitation, whether they should be paid, whether they can give properly informed consent and whether their eggs and bodies are becoming commodified. However, few of the debates have benefitted from insights from the women themselves. We address this gap in knowledge by reporting on a study investigating women's views and experiences of a scheme in which they can volunteer, in their capacity as fertility patients, to 'share' their eggs with researchers and receive a reduction in in vitro fertilisation fees. We focus our discussion on the question of exploitation, a concept central to many sociological and ethical interests. In brief, our analysis suggests that while interviewees acknowledge the potential of this scheme to be exploitative, they argue that this is not the case, emphasising their ability to act autonomously in deciding to volunteer. Nonetheless, these freely made decisions do not necessarily take place under circumstances of their choosing. We discuss the implications of this for egg provision in general and for understandings of exploitation.

Indexed as

Directed Tissue DonationHealth LiteracyBiomedical ResearchEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleInterviews as TopicMaleOocyte DonationOocyte RetrievalTissue DonorsWomen

Identifiers

PMID22443419
PMCPMC3533176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.