Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22443146›Full record

ArticleThe journal of sexual medicine2012

What we don't talk about when we don't talk about sex: results of a national survey of U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists.

Janelle N Sobecki, Farr A Curlin, Kenneth A Rasinski, Stacy Tessler Lindau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of sexual medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy trial of an Internet-based intervention for cancer-related female sexual dysfunction.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2013
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The Relationship between the Sexual Double Standard and Women's Sexual Health and Comfort.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janelle N SobeckiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. janellesobecki@gmail.com
Farr A Curlin
Kenneth A Rasinski
Stacy Tessler Lindau
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Chicago Medical Center · US

Funding

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT COREP30AG012857 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 1999 to 2013
$5.7M
Sexuality, Aging and Heart Disease: Translating from Population to PatientK23AG032870 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LINDAU, STACY TESSLER · 2009 to 2012
$747k
Religious Commitments and Clinical EngagementsK23AT002749 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CURLIN, FARR A · 2005 to 2009
$630k
NCCIH NIH HHS 1 K23 AT002749NCCIH NIH HHS K23 AT002749NIA NIH HHS 1K23AG032870-01A1NIA NIH HHS 5P30 AG 012857NIA NIH HHS K23 AG032870NIA NIH HHS P30 AG012857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSexuality is a key aspect of women's physical and psychological health. Research shows both patients and physicians face barriers to communication about sexuality. Given their expertise and training in addressing conditions of the female genital tract across the female life course, obstetrician/gynecologists (ob/gyns) are well positioned among all physicians to address sexuality issues with female patients. New practice guidelines for management of female sexual dysfunction and the importance of female sexual behavior and function to virtually all aspects of ob/gyn care, and to women's health more broadly, warrant up-to-date information regarding ob/gyns' sexual-history-taking routine.

aimsTo determine ob/gyns' practices of communication with patients about sexuality, and to examine the individual and practice-level correlates of such communication.

methodA population-based sample of 1,154 practicing U.S. ob/gyns (53% male; mean age 48 years) was surveyed regarding their practices of communication with patients about sex.

main outcome measuresSelf-reported frequency measures of ob/gyns' communication practices with patients including whether or not ob/gyns discuss patients' sexual activities, sexual orientation, satisfaction with sexual life, pleasure with sexual activity, and sexual problems or dysfunction, as well as whether or not one ever expresses disapproval of or disagreement with patients' sexual practices. Multivariable analysis was used to correlate physicians' personal and practice characteristics with these communication practices.

resultsSurvey response rate was 65.6%. Sixty-three percent of ob/gyns reported routinely assessing patients' sexual activities; 40% routinely asked about sexual problems. Fewer asked about sexual satisfaction (28.5%), sexual orientation/identity (27.7%), or pleasure with sexual activity (13.8%). A quarter of ob/gyns reported they had expressed disapproval of patients' sexual practices. Ob/gyns practicing predominately gynecology were significantly more likely than other ob/gyns to routinely ask about each of the five outcomes investigated.

conclusionThe majority of U.S. ob/gyns report routinely asking patients about their sexual activities, but most other areas of patients' sexuality are not routinely discussed.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Sex FactorsSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalSexualitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22443146
PMCPMC3387502
OpenAlexW1860175866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.