Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22442752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2012

A fast and flexible panoramic virtual reality system for behavioural and electrophysiological experiments.

Jouni Takalo, Arto Piironen, Anna Honkanen, Mikko Lempeä, Mika Aikio, Tuomas Tuukkanen, Mikko Vähäsöyrinki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Naturalistic neuroscience and virtual reality.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  3. Ant foragers might present variation and universal property in their movements.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of ocelli in cockroach optomotor performance.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Insect-machine hybrid system for understanding and evaluating sensory-motor control by sex pheromone in Bombyx mori.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jouni Takalo
Arto Piironen
Anna Honkanen
Mikko Lempeä
Mika Aikio
Tuomas Tuukkanen
Mikko Vähäsöyrinki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ideally, neuronal functions would be studied by performing experiments with unconstrained animals whilst they behave in their natural environment. Although this is not feasible currently for most animal models, one can mimic the natural environment in the laboratory by using a virtual reality (VR) environment. Here we present a novel VR system based upon a spherical projection of computer generated images using a modified commercial data projector with an add-on fish-eye lens. This system provides equidistant visual stimulation with extensive coverage of the visual field, high spatio-temporal resolution and flexible stimulus generation using a standard computer. It also includes a track-ball system for closed-loop behavioural experiments with walking animals. We present a detailed description of the system and characterize it thoroughly. Finally, we demonstrate the VR system's performance whilst operating in closed-loop conditions by showing the movement trajectories of the cockroaches during exploratory behaviour in a VR forest.

Identifiers

PMID22442752
PMCPMC3310229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.