Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22442194›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2012

Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Anthony Sclafani, Karen Ackroff

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanisms and Functions of Sweet Reception in Oral and Extraoral Organs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Glucose Sensing in the Hepatic Portal Vein and Its Role in Food Intake and Reward.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anthony SclafaniDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA. ASclafani@gc.cuny.edu
Karen Ackroff
City University of New York · US

Funding

Carbohydrate Appetite, Fat Appetite and ObesityR37DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
CARBOHYDRATE APPETITE, FAT APPETITE, AND OBESITYR01DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI ACKROFF, KAREN, SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 1986 to 2015
$2.0M
Neuropharmacology of Learned Food PreferencesR01DK071761 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS DK-031135NIDDK NIH HHS DK-071761NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK031135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discovery of taste and nutrient receptors (chemosensors) in the gut has led to intensive research on their functions. Whereas oral sugar, fat, and umami taste receptors stimulate nutrient appetite, these and other chemosensors in the gut have been linked to digestive, metabolic, and satiating effects that influence nutrient utilization and inhibit appetite. Gut chemosensors may have an additional function as well: to provide positive feedback signals that condition food preferences and stimulate appetite. The postoral stimulatory actions of nutrients are documented by flavor preference conditioning and appetite stimulation produced by gastric and intestinal infusions of carbohydrate, fat, and protein. Recent findings suggest an upper intestinal site of action, although postabsorptive nutrient actions may contribute to flavor preference learning. The gut chemosensors that generate nutrient conditioning signals remain to be identified; some have been excluded, including sweet (T1R3) and fatty acid (CD36) sensors. The gut-brain signaling pathways (neural, hormonal) are incompletely understood, although vagal afferents are implicated in glutamate conditioning but not carbohydrate or fat conditioning. Brain dopamine reward systems are involved in postoral carbohydrate and fat conditioning but less is known about the reward systems mediating protein/glutamate conditioning. Continued research on the postoral stimulatory actions of nutrients may enhance our understanding of human food preference learning.

Indexed as

FoodAppetiteChemoreceptor CellsDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsFeedback, PhysiologicalFood PreferencesGastrointestinal TractHumansPhysical FitnessSignal TransductionDietary CarbohydratesDietary Fats

Identifiers

PMID22442194
PMCPMC3362145
OpenAlexW2155286130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.