Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22442087›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

fMRI repetition suppression for familiar but not arbitrary actions with tools.

Kenneth F Valyear, Jason P Gallivan, D Adam McLean, Jody C Culham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Human Neuroimaging Reveals Differences in Activation and Connectivity between Real and Pantomimed Tool Use.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Action goals and the praxis network: an fMRI study.Brain structure & function · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Hand-Selective Visual Regions Represent How to Grasp 3D Tools: Brain Decoding during Real Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kenneth F ValyearDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. kfvalyear@gmail.com
Jason P Gallivan
D Adam McLean
Jody C Culham
Western University · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP84293
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For humans, daily life is characterized by routine interaction with many different tools for which corresponding actions are specified and performed according to well-learned procedures. The current study used functional MRI (fMRI) repetition suppression (RS) to identify brain areas underlying the transformation of visually defined tool properties to corresponding motor programs for conventional use. Before grasping and demonstrating how to use a specific tool, participants passively viewed either the same (repeated) tool or a different (non-repeated) tool. Repetition of tools led to reduced fMRI signals (RS) within a selective network of parietal and premotor areas. Comparison with newly learned, arbitrarily defined control actions revealed specificity of RS for tool use, thought to reflect differences in the extent of previous sensorimotor experience. The findings indicate that familiar tools are visually represented within the same sensorimotor areas underlying their dexterous use according to learned properties defined by previous experience. This interpretation resonates with the broader concept of affordance specification considered fundamental to action planning and execution whereby action-relevant object properties (affordances) are visually represented in sensorimotor areas. The current findings extend this view to reveal that affordance specification in humans includes learned object properties defined by previous sensorimotor experience. From an evolutionary perspective, the neural mechanisms identified in the current study offer clear survival advantage, providing fast efficient transformation of visual information to appropriate motor responses based on previous experience.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultBrainBrain MappingFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFunctional LateralityHandHand StrengthHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleOxygenPsychomotor PerformanceRecognition, PsychologyOxygen

Identifiers

PMID22442087
PMCPMC6621227
OpenAlexW2035561054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.