Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22442081›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012

Perceptual inference predicts contextual modulations of sensory responses.

Timm Lochmann, Udo A Ernst, Sophie Denève

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Computational methods to study information processing in neural circuits.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Relating Divisive Normalization to Neuronal Response Variability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Temporal Contingencies Determine Whether Adaptation Strengthens or Weakens Normalization.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timm LochmannDépartement d'Études Cognitives, École normale supérieure, Collège de France, Paris, France. lochman@ni.tu-berlin.de.
Udo A Ernst
Sophie Denève

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory receptive fields (RFs) vary as a function of stimulus properties and measurement methods. Previous stimuli or surrounding stimuli facilitate, suppress, or change the selectivity of sensory neurons' responses. Here, we propose that these spatiotemporal contextual dependencies are signatures of efficient perceptual inference and can be explained by a single neural mechanism, input targeted divisive inhibition. To respond both selectively and reliably, sensory neurons should behave as active predictors rather than passive filters. In particular, they should remove input they can predict ("explain away") from the synaptic inputs to all other neurons. This implies that RFs are constantly and dynamically reshaped by the spatial and temporal context, while the true selectivity of sensory neurons resides in their "predictive field." This approach motivates a reinvestigation of sensory representations and particularly the role and specificity of surround suppression and adaptation in sensory areas.

Indexed as

Brain MappingModels, NeurologicalAction PotentialsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsComputer SimulationHumansNeural InhibitionPerceptionPredictive Value of TestsSensationSensory Receptor CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID22442081
PMCPMC6621224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.