Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22441775›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2012

Risk factors for Clostridium difficile toxin-positive diarrhea: a population-based prospective case-control study.

I Vesteinsdottir, S Gudlaugsdottir, R Einarsdottir, E Kalaitzakis, O Sigurdardottir, E S Bjornsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Epidemiologic profile of community-acquiredEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Global burden ofJournal of global health · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Epidemiology ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  10. Risk Factors forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Proton-Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk of Community-Associated Clostridium difficile Infection.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Role of Surgery inClinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  14. Risk Factors for PrimaryFrontiers in public health · 2020
    Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I VesteinsdottirFaculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.
S Gudlaugsdottir
R Einarsdottir
E Kalaitzakis
O Sigurdardottir
E S Bjornsson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) is of major concern. However, by minimizing known risk factors, the incidence can be decreased. The aim of this investigation was to calculate the incidence and assess risk factors for CDI in our population. A 1-year prospective population-based nationwide study in Iceland of CDIs was carried out. For risk factor evaluation, each case was matched with two age- and sex-matched controls that tested negative for C. difficile toxin. A total of 128 CDIs were identified. The crude incidence was 54 cases annually per 100,000 population >18 years of age. Incidence increased exponentially with older age (319 per 100,000 population >86 years of age). Community-acquired origin was 27 %. Independent risk factors included: dicloxacillin (odds ratio [OR]: 7.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-30.1), clindamycin (OR: 6.09, 95 % CI: 2.23-16.61), ceftriaxone (OR: 4.28, 95 % CI: 1.59-11.49), living in a retirement home (OR: 3.9, 95 % CI: 1.69-9.16), recent hospital stay (OR: 2.3, 95 % CI: 1.37-3.87). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) were used by 60/111 (54 %) versus 91/222 (41 %) (p = 0.026) and ciprofloxacin 19/111 (17 %) versus 19/222 (9 %) (p = 0.027) for cases and controls, respectively. In all, 75 % of primary CDIs treated with metronidazole recovered from one course of treatment. CDI was mostly found among elderly patients. The most commonly identified risk factors were broad-spectrum antibiotics and recent contact with health care institutions. PPI use was significantly more prevalent among CDI patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCase-Control StudiesCeftriaxoneChildChild, PreschoolClindamycinClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsConfidence IntervalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial ToxinsCeftriaxoneClindamycinDicloxacillinEnterotoxinsMetronidazoleProton Pump InhibitorstcdA protein, Clostridium difficiletoxB protein, Clostridium difficile

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.