Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22441659›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2012

Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction.

Warren K Bickel, David P Jarmolowicz, E Terry Mueller, Kirstin M Gatchalian, Samuel M McClure

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 122 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A meta-analytic investigation of the role of reward on inhibitory control.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Warren K BickelAddiction Recovery Research Center and Virginia Tech Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, 2 Riverside Circle, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA. wkbickel@vtc.vt.edu
David P Jarmolowicz
E Terry Mueller
Kirstin M Gatchalian
Samuel M McClure

Funding

IMPROVING COMBINED BUPRENORPHINE-BEHAVIORAL TREATMENTR01DA012997 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2000 to 2009
$8.9M
Translational Training in AddictionT32DA022981 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Melissa Jean Zielinski · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Inter-Temporal Trade-offs in the Risky Decisions of Cocaine AddictsR01DA030241 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K, MONTAGUE, P READ · 2010 to 2014
$3.6M
Executive Function Therapy for Stimulant AddictionR01DA024080 · NIDA · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BICKEL, WARREN K · 2008 to 2012
$3.1M
The Behavioral Economics of RelapseR01DA022386 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SHEFFER, CHRISTINE ELIZABETH · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA012997NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 022386NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA022386NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 024080NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024080NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA 024080-02S1NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA030241NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA12997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAlthough there is considerable interest in how either executive function (EF) or impulsivity relate to addiction, there is little apparent overlap between these research areas.

objectivesThe present paper aims to determine if components of these two constructs are conceptual antipodes--widely separated on a shared continuum.

methodsEFs and impulsivities were compared and contrasted. Specifically, the definitions of the components of EF and impulsivity, the methods used to measure the various components, the populations of drug users that show deficits in these components, and the neural substrates of these components were compared and contrasted.

resultsEach component of impulsivity had an antipode in EF. EF, however, covered a wider range of phenomena, including compulsivity.

conclusionsImpulsivity functions as an antipode of certain components of EF. Recognition of the relationship between EF and impulsivity may inform the scientific inquiry of behavioral problems such as addiction. Other theoretical implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionBiomedical ResearchHumansImpulsive BehaviorSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID22441659
PMCPMC4035182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.