Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22441650›Full record

Trial reportClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2012

Preliminary assessment of the efficacy of a T-cell-based influenza vaccine, MVA-NP+M1, in humans.

Patrick J Lillie, Tamara K Berthoud, Timothy J Powell, Teresa Lambe, Caitlin Mullarkey, Alexandra J Spencer, Matthew Hamill, Yanchun Peng, Marie-Eve Blais, Christopher J A Duncan and 9 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00993083 (A Phase IIA Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 162 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00993083 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase IIA Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of a New Influenza Candidate Vaccine MVA-NP+M1 In Healthy Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2009 to 2010Enrolled27ConditionsInfluenzaArmsMVA-NP+M1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 247 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Viral vector-based influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Patrick J LillieJenner Institute, University of Oxford, UK.
Tamara K Berthoud
Timothy J Powell
Teresa Lambe
Caitlin Mullarkey
Alexandra J Spencer
Matthew Hamill
Yanchun Peng
Marie-Eve Blais
Christopher J A Duncan
Susanne H Sheehy
Tom Havelock
Saul N Faust
Rob Lambkin Williams
Anthony Gilbert
John Oxford
Tao Dong
Adrian V S Hill
Sarah C Gilbert
University of Oxford · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBInstitute of Molecular Medicine · INNIHR Wellcome Trust Southampton Clinical Research Facility · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0600520Medical Research Council G1001046Wellcome Trust 081865Wellcome Trust 090532Wellcome Trust 095540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe novel influenza vaccine MVA-NP+M1 is designed to boost cross-reactive T-cell responses to internal antigens of the influenza A virus that are conserved across all subtypes, providing protection against both influenza disease and virus shedding against all influenza A viruses. Following a phase 1 clinical study that demonstrated vaccine safety and immunogenicity, a phase 2a vaccination and influenza challenge study has been conducted in healthy adult volunteers.

methodsVolunteers with no measurable serum antibodies to influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2005 received either a single vaccination with MVA-NP+M1 or no vaccination. T-cell responses to the vaccine antigens were measured at enrollment and again prior to virus challenge. All volunteers underwent intranasal administration of influenza A/Wisconsin/67/2005 while in a quarantine unit and were monitored for symptoms of influenza disease and virus shedding.

resultsVolunteers had a significantly increased T-cell response to the vaccine antigens following a single dose of the vaccine, with an increase in cytolytic effector molecules. Intranasal influenza challenge was undertaken without safety issues. Two of 11 vaccinees and 5 of 11 control subjects developed laboratory-confirmed influenza (symptoms plus virus shedding). Symptoms of influenza were less pronounced in the vaccinees and there was a significant reduction in the number of days of virus shedding in those vaccinees who developed influenza (mean, 1.09 days in controls, 0.45 days in vaccinees, P = .036).

conclusionsThis study provides the first demonstration of clinical efficacy of a T-cell-based influenza vaccine and indicates that further clinical development should be undertaken. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00993083.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdolescentAdultAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralHLA-A2 AntigenHumansInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaMiddle AgedNucleocapsid ProteinsPilot ProjectsRNA-Binding ProteinsT-LymphocytesAntibodies, ViralAntigens, ViralHLA-A2 AntigenInfluenza VaccinesInterferon-gammaM1 protein, Influenza A virusNP protein, Influenza A virusNucleocapsid ProteinsRNA-Binding ProteinsViral Core ProteinsViral Matrix Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22441650
PMCPMC3369564
OpenAlexW2098337510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.