ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2012
Abscess penetration of cefpirome: concentrations and simulated pharmacokinetic profiles in pus.
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03476941 (Antibiotic Irrigations for Intra-Abdominal Drains), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Antibiotic Irrigations for Intra-Abdominal Drains
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAbscess patients frequently receive antibiotic therapy when incision cannot be performed or in addition to incision. However, antibiotic concentrations in human abscesses are widely unknown.
methodsPharmacokinetics of cefpirome in 12 human abscesses located in different body regions was studied. Cefpirome (2 g) was administered as an intravenous short infusion, and concentrations were measured in plasma over an 8-h period and in abscesses at incision. A pharmacokinetic two-stage model was applied.
resultsAt abscess incision performed 158 ± 112 min after the start of the infusion, the cefpirome concentrations in the abscess fluid varied markedly, ranging from ≤0.1 (limit of quantification) to 47 (mean 8.4 ± 14.1 ) mg/L. Cefpirome was detectable in nine of 12 abscesses. Maximum concentrations were calculated to be 183 ± 106 mg/L in plasma and 12 ± 16 mg/L in the abscess. A cefpirome concentration of 2 mg/L, which is the minimum concentration inhibiting growth of 90% of the most relevant bacterial pathogens, was exceeded spontaneously in six of 12 abscesses after a single dose. Cefpirome concentrations in the abscess did not correlate with either the pH or the ratio of surface area to volume of the abscesses, nor with plasma pharmacokinetics.
conclusionsCefpirome may be useful to treat abscess patients because it was detectable in most abscesses after a single dose. However, the penetration of cefpirome into abscesses is extremely variable and cannot be predicted by measuring other available covariates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.