Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22440724›Full record

ArticleMolecular phylogenetics and evolution2012

Macroevolution of venom apparatus innovations in auger snails (Gastropoda; Conoidea; Terebridae).

M Castelin, N Puillandre, Yu I Kantor, M V Modica, Y Terryn, C Cruaud, P Bouchet, M Holford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

M CastelinHunter College, The City University of New York, NY, NY 10065, USA. magcastelin@mnhn.fr
N Puillandre
Yu I Kantor
M V Modica
Y Terryn
C Cruaud
P Bouchet
M Holford
Institut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité · FRAmerican Museum of Natural History · USAtheris Laboratories (Switzerland) · CHGenoscope · FRSevertsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution · RUThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

Basic and Translational Research Center for Reducing Health DisparitiesG12MD007599 · NIMHD · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI ANGULO, JESUS A · 2012 to 2017
$14.6M
Chemical Biodiversity: Investigating the Phylogeny and Functional Toxins of VenomSC2GM088096 · NIGMS · YORK COLLEGE · PI HOLFORD, MANDE N. · 2009 to 2010
$314k
NIGMS NIH HHS GM088096NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM088096NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Terebridae are a diverse family of tropical and subtropical marine gastropods that use a complex and modular venom apparatus to produce toxins that capture polychaete and enteropneust preys. The complexity of the terebrid venom apparatus suggests that venom apparatus development in the Terebridae could be linked to the diversification of the group and can be analyzed within a molecular phylogenetic scaffold to better understand terebrid evolution. Presented here is a molecular phylogeny of 89 terebrid species belonging to 12 of the 15 currently accepted genera, based on Bayesian inference and Maximum Likelihood analyses of amplicons of 3 mitochondrial (COI, 16S and 12S) and one nuclear (28S) genes. The evolution of the anatomy of the terebrid venom apparatus was assessed by mapping traits of six related characters: proboscis, venom gland, odontophore, accessory proboscis structure, radula, and salivary glands. A novel result concerning terebrid phylogeny was the discovery of a previously unrecognized lineage, which includes species of Euterebra and Duplicaria. The non-monophyly of most terebrid genera analyzed indicates that the current genus-level classification of the group is plagued with homoplasy and requires further taxonomic investigations. Foregut anatomy in the family Terebridae reveals an inordinate diversity of features that covers the range of variability within the entire superfamily Conoidea, and that hypodermic radulae have likely evolved independently on at least three occasions. These findings illustrate that terebrid venom apparatus evolution is not perfunctory, and involves independent and numerous changes of central features in the foregut anatomy. The multiple emergence of hypodermic marginal radular teeth in terebrids are presumably associated with variable functionalities, suggesting that terebrids have adapted to dietary changes that may have resulted from predator-prey relationships. The anatomical and phylogenetic results presented serve as a starting point to advance investigations about the role of predator-prey interactions in the diversification of the Terebridae and the impact on their peptide toxins, which are promising bioactive compounds for biomedical research and therapeutic drug development.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhylogenyAnimalsAnimal StructuresBase SequenceBayes TheoremDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalGastrointestinal TractLikelihood FunctionsMadagascarModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMollusk VenomsMozambiqueOceaniaDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalMollusk Venoms

Identifiers

PMID22440724
PMCPMC3389042
OpenAlexW2069221946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.