Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22438826›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Temporal transcriptional profiling of somatic and germ cells reveals biased lineage priming of sexual fate in the fetal mouse gonad.

Samantha A Jameson, Anirudh Natarajan, Jonah Cool, Tony DeFalco, Danielle M Maatouk, Lindsey Mork, Steven C Munger, Blanche Capel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Building a resilient ovarian reserve: Early soma-oocyte interactions.Current topics in developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samantha A JamesonDepartment of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anirudh Natarajan
Jonah Cool
Tony DeFalco
Danielle M Maatouk
Lindsey Mork
Steven C Munger
Blanche Capel

Funding

Project 6P50GM081883 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENFEY, PHILIP N · 2007 to 2012
$14.9M
Training Program in Developmental & Stem Cell BiologyT32HD040372 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Terry H Lechler · 2001 to 2026
$8.9M
OPPOSING PATHWAYS IN MAMMALIAN SEX DETERMINATIONR01HD039963 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPEL, BLANCHE · 2001 to 2025
$4.7M
Murine Atlas of Genitourinary Smooth Muscle DevelopmentU01DK070219 · NIDDK · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI LESSARD, JAMES LOUIS · 2005 to 2009
$4.3M
Opposing Pathways in Mammalian Sex DeterminationR37HD039963 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPEL, BLANCHE · 2011 to 2020
$3.5M
Regulation of Germ Cell Pluripotency Through The RNA-Binding Protein, DND1R01GM087500 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CAPEL, BLANCHE · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
A new cell population regulating cell fate and morphogenesis in the mouse testisF32HD058433 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DEFALCO, TONY J. · 2009 to 2011
$162k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD058433NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD058433-01NICHD NIH HHS HD039963NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039963NICHD NIH HHS R37 HD039963NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040372NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK070219NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081883NIGMS NIH HHS P50GM081883NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The divergence of distinct cell populations from multipotent progenitors is poorly understood, particularly in vivo. The gonad is an ideal place to study this process, because it originates as a bipotential primordium where multiple distinct lineages acquire sex-specific fates as the organ differentiates as a testis or an ovary. To gain a more detailed understanding of the process of gonadal differentiation at the level of the individual cell populations, we conducted microarrays on sorted cells from XX and XY mouse gonads at three time points spanning the period when the gonadal cells transition from sexually undifferentiated progenitors to their respective sex-specific fates. We analyzed supporting cells, interstitial/stromal cells, germ cells, and endothelial cells. This work identified genes specifically depleted and enriched in each lineage as it underwent sex-specific differentiation. We determined that the sexually undifferentiated germ cell and supporting cell progenitors showed lineage priming. We found that germ cell progenitors were primed with a bias toward the male fate. In contrast, supporting cells were primed with a female bias, indicative of the robust repression program involved in the commitment to XY supporting cell fate. This study provides a molecular explanation reconciling the female default and balanced models of sex determination and represents a rich resource for the field. More importantly, it yields new insights into the mechanisms by which different cell types in a single organ adopt their respective fates.

Indexed as

Endothelial CellsGerm CellsGonadsStromal CellsAnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageEmbryonic DevelopmentFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMaleMiceMicroarray AnalysisSex Determination Processes

Identifiers

PMID22438826
PMCPMC3305395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.