ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2012
How to link ontologies and protein-protein interactions to literature: text-mining approaches and the BioCreative experience.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- PCAO2: an ontology for integration of prostate cancer associated genotypic, phenotypic and lifestyle data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- A Hybrid Protocol for Finding Novel Gene Targets for Various Diseases Using Microarray Expression Data Analysis and Text Mining.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- From word models to executable models of signaling networks using automated assembly.Molecular systems biology · 2017Article
- Computer-Aided Experiment Planning toward Causal Discovery in Neuroscience.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017Article
- Curation and analysis of multitargeting agents for polypharmacological modeling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2014Article
- Mining locus tags in PubMed Central to improve microbial gene annotation.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Assisting manual literature curation for protein-protein interactions using BioQRator.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- BioCreative-IV virtual issue.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2014Article
- Automatic extraction of biomolecular interactions: an empirical approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2013Article
- PubTator: a web-based text mining tool for assisting biocuration.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Polypharmacology: drug discovery for the future.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2013Review
- The BioGRID interaction database: 2013 update.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- Text-mining solutions for biomedical research: enabling integrative biology.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2012Review
- Biocuration workflows and text mining: overview of the BioCreative 2012 Workshop Track II.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is an increasing interest in developing ontologies and controlled vocabularies to improve the efficiency and consistency of manual literature curation, to enable more formal biocuration workflow results and ultimately to improve analysis of biological data. Two ontologies that have been successfully used for this purpose are the Gene Ontology (GO) for annotating aspects of gene products and the Molecular Interaction ontology (PSI-MI) used by databases that archive protein-protein interactions. The examination of protein interactions has proven to be extremely promising for the understanding of cellular processes. Manual mapping of information from the biomedical literature to bio-ontology terms is one of the most challenging components in the curation pipeline. It requires that expert curators interpret the natural language descriptions contained in articles and infer their semantic equivalents in the ontology (controlled vocabulary). Since manual curation is a time-consuming process, there is strong motivation to implement text-mining techniques to automatically extract annotations from free text. A range of text mining strategies has been devised to assist in the automated extraction of biological data. These strategies either recognize technical terms used recurrently in the literature and propose them as candidates for inclusion in ontologies, or retrieve passages that serve as evidential support for annotating an ontology term, e.g. from the PSI-MI or GO controlled vocabularies. Here, we provide a general overview of current text-mining methods to automatically extract annotations of GO and PSI-MI ontology terms in the context of the BioCreative (Critical Assessment of Information Extraction Systems in Biology) challenge. Special emphasis is given to protein-protein interaction data and PSI-MI terms referring to interaction detection methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.